Forum Moderators: goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Guys on TV

ABC's "World News Tonight" Jan 20

         

Eva_Geddes

11:28 pm on Jan 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is anyone else watching this? I'm curious if they are going to say anything new, or if it will be another "it's so much fun to work at Google" puff piece.

truezeta

11:47 pm on Jan 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Did they say anything new?

Key_Master

12:07 am on Jan 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



A little huff and puff.

Larry Page compared the feds demand for their search data to a hypothetical example of the feds being able to search private residences for pornography without cause. It sounded to me to be more of a personal stand based upon the principal of the issue and less so on business grounds.

Key_Master

12:14 am on Jan 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

iblaine

12:23 am on Jan 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Further news that Google does not want to give into demands + typical Google fluff piece

Leosghost

12:26 am on Jan 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



extracts from the article in "quote boxes" ..
smoke
The Bush administration wants to know how often computer users search for child pornography on the Web — specifically, how many times Google users look for the sites. It says it needs the data to prove that the problem is so widespread that criminal penalties are needed to stop it.

mirrors
The Child Online Protection Act, which carries criminal penalties for online pornographers, was passed in 1998. But the Supreme Court stopped it from being enforced and ordered a lower court to determine whether filtering software could protect kids from the Web sites without violating adult free speech.

real agenda? ..ask Pat Robertson ..about anything ..?
his "official public" thinking is whats behind this?

What is in the "bookmarks" of the moral right ..that might be really interesting ..based on past experiences ;)