Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.238.178

Forum Moderators: goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google, And Others, Invests $130Million In ESolar

     
6:07 pm on Apr 21, 2008 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23279
votes: 360


Solar thermal company eSolar said on Monday it closed $130 million in funding from Google Inc's philanthropy arm and other investors.

The funds will be used to build and deploy solar thermal power plants to supply utilities with clean, renewable power, the company said in a statement. It plans to have a fully operational plant in Southern California later this year.

Google, And Others, Invests $130Million In ESolar [reuters.com]

7:32 pm on Apr 21, 2008 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Oct 29, 2007
posts:457
votes: 0


Way to go Google! Now if they could just get those SERPs looking good again....
4:19 am on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 26, 2003
posts:705
votes: 0


Interesting that Google calls their funding "philanthropy" .. wonder if it was given or invested?
7:09 am on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:Dec 29, 2003
posts:5428
votes: 0


expat, I think they invest and give what the earn. It's a different charity, more like a venture capital one, but what they gain stays for charity.
9:40 am on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from DE 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 25, 2002
posts:926
votes: 0


"philanthropy"? gimme a break! solar companies earn big $$$.
11:18 am on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:May 9, 2007
posts:1362
votes: 0


Pocket money anyway. Well, to Google. Now how can I get that brand new solar panel on my roof paid? Not from my Adsense earnings, that much is clear. *sigh*
1:54 pm on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


I just wish all these solar investments actually lowered costs. It just seems prices keep going UP UP UP for panels. Glad to see google doing its green thing but somehow i don't see this investment impacting my probability of going solar anytime soon.
5:42 pm on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
posts:14650
votes: 94


It just seems prices keep going UP UP UP for panels.

You refer to the photovoltaic array technology which IMO is still too inefficient for large scale prime time deployment and that's why the cost is so high because it's still "boutique" technology not embraced by the masses. If you see panels on every rooftop, prices would go down as mass production creates economy of scale, just like it did for computers.

What eSolar does is heliostat technology which is solar thermal technology, totally different beast and least likely to become outmoded.

Besides, it makes sense for Google to invest in alternative power sources because Google doesn't exist if the power grid runs out of fuel.

No electricity, no internet, no Google.

How's that for self-serving philanthropy? ;)

6:34 pm on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 22, 2005
posts:230
votes: 0


G has also invested Nanosolar -- Cheapest Solar Panel [metaefficient.com]:

Basically, Nanosolar is able to print solar panels on machines that resemble printing presses. The company, whose backers include Google’s co-founders, say it is producing the world’s lowest-cost solar panel, costing as little as 99 cents per watt.
7:03 pm on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2004
posts:1392
votes: 0


Yeah, and maybe someday we will actually see one of the Nanosolar panels produced, and I can pretty much bet it will be a lot more than $1 per watt.

[edited by: Wlauzon at 7:07 pm (utc) on April 22, 2008]

7:44 pm on Apr 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
posts:14650
votes: 94


Even then, the Nanosolar panels will probably produce even better in combination with heliostat technology. Some people have already been experimenting with cheap mylar (~$1/ft.) to make low cost solar collectors that focus all their energy in a single solar panel and it performed like 5-10 solar panels with that extra boost of solar energy.

I'm thinking it'll be a combo of the 2 technologies that makes it expensive, affordable, and boosts the performance.

11:44 pm on Apr 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 22, 2005
posts:230
votes: 0


eSolar says at [esolar.com...]

Covering 1% of the Sahara Desert with eSolar power plants would provide enough electricity to power the entire world.

That's quite the statement.

4:34 pm on Apr 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Nov 20, 2007
posts:585
votes: 0


The world really needs high production of solar panels. Why do these things cost so much? That new thin stuff would be nice to cover the roof with.

Anyone got any of this on the cheap?
[powerfilmsolar.com...]

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members