Forum Moderators: goodroi
The University of California has joined Google Inc.'s bid to scan the book collections of the world's great libraries, the organisations said on Tuesday, marking renewed momentum for a project nearly derailed by stiff resistance from publishers.The top Web search company said it will fund the scanning of "several million" of the 34 million titles in the University of California's libraries, as part of a year-and-a-half old project to make major library collections searchable online.
University In U.S. Joins Google Book Scan Push [today.reuters.co.uk]
That's a heck of a lot of books and data!
well, buying a book each will not help their case either.
Google is too cheap to even buy the books and they claim they are "helping" the publisher,
They're scanning only "several million" of 34 million titles, so they won't be helping or hurting the publishers in most cases (especially since many of those books are likely be out of print or even in the public domain).
Maybe you're confusing the Google Books Library Project with the Google Books Partner Program. You can learn about both programs (including the differences between them) at:
Library Project
[books.google.com...]
Partner Program
[books.google.com...]
Maybe you're confusing the Google Books Library Project with the Google Books Partner Program. You can learn about both programs (including the differences between them) at:Library Project
[books.google.com...]Partner Program
[books.google.com...]Thanks for the links but in typical googly speak they say nothing and as usual the agreements made with the universities are shrouded in secrecy via NDAs. Bottom line is they could at least BUY a few books, they act like starving grad students while fussing over the size of their beds in the personal 767. :0
Universities in the US are heavily funded with taxpayer dollars (Stanford is 35% taxpayer funded) and the agreements they make with G$$G or anyone else should be subject to sunshine laws. It all smacks of "dirty dealing".
[edited by: TypicalSurfer at 10:10 pm (utc) on Aug. 9, 2006]
heavily funded with taxpayer dollars