Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.208.6

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Froogle Feeds

What's the best approach to start feeds?

     
5:28 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 5, 2003
posts:82
votes: 0


Hi!

I have Froogle feeds setup for now. But there are so many engines who spring-up everyday and we feel like feeding them.

What in your opinion is the best strategy to keep-up with the feeds? I am thinking of automizing feeds using a script I just thought of asking your advice.

TIA
Neh

4:29 am on May 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member googleguy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 8, 2001
posts:2882
votes: 0


Just digging through older posts and I noticed that no one answered this. Are you talking about providing your feeds to a wider set of search engines, now that your feed to Froogle is set up?
9:21 pm on June 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 5, 2003
posts:82
votes: 0


Nop,

I am only concerned for Froogle at this point.

Do I have to optimize the product pages to get a better listing? The pages are nice, I bet.

Thanks for the reply, GoogleGuy.

Neh

9:40 pm on June 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2003
posts:844
votes: 0


Froogle is a work in progress.

I have seen that optimizing the title and description in the feed will get you further than optimizing the page the feed leads to.

10:13 pm on June 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2003
posts:1316
votes: 0


If you're submitting a Froogle feed, all you need for optimization is to have meaningful titles and descriptions.

I use a script that automatically extracts all the products from my database, generates the feed file, and uploads it. I haven't tried Yahoo, but I noticed that it uses a similar (or identical) format, so it shouldn't be too hard to support multiple engines.

5:06 pm on June 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 5, 2003
posts:82
votes: 0


Yahoo!

I dont know if they have a feeds program like Froogle.

I'd like to try that one too. please let me know what is it.

Also, I got an e-mail from Froogle people saying "Please keep the titles and everything else the same as they are on the actual page" I doubt I can get around with the "changing the titles in the feeds" thing.

thanks,
Neh

5:23 pm on June 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2003
posts:1316
votes: 0


Here's the info on Yahoo's product search:
[products.yahoo.com...]

I meant optimize the title and description in the feed and on the actual site - they do have to match.

5:33 pm on June 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:May 20, 2003
posts:76
votes: 0


I have a feed to froogle. One thing I noticed, is that somehow a few items slipped in that weren't in the feed. Note however, that these items are actually services offered by my site for a fee, coupled with the associated image file. I'm quite pleased with this as I originally thought I could only include the physical projects in the feed. Any idea if this was done manually by froogle staff, or if it was spidered to enhance my feed? when i submit my update, should I include the service/picture combinations, in addition to the product/picture combos?
6:10 pm on June 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 9, 2002
posts:245
votes: 0


coolasafanman, it's unlikely that items not in your feed were added to Froogle manually or are included to enhance your feed. They're just the result of spidering and are there independent of your feed. It's often possible to have the same product listed twice, but the feed result will rank quite a bit higher and will be more accurate.
6:26 pm on June 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:May 20, 2003
posts:76
votes: 0


thank you. so therefore what you're saying is that providing a feed will not eliminate results, just clarify them...