Has NASA tried to fool us again?

[TryAgain]

[lippeatt.com...]

[macrost]

lol!

:o

[DrDoc]

LOL That's funny :)

[Herenvardo]

Has NASA tried to fool us again?

tried? of course
successed? Depend of each person. But I still remember the videos of the USA flag waving at the unexisting moon's winds.
Even when I know that this photos could be a trick, I believe that NASA's robots have reached Mars.
It's true that NASA has tried to fool us sometimes, but this is not their main goal. They WANT to conquer the space, and they're trying to do it.
Do you know why the "space race" began between URSS and USA?
Do you know what found the astronauts when wlaked on the moon?
Do you know why after an Apollo exploded no more ships where sent to the moon?
I know.

Herenvardö

[DrDoc]

...and you're not going to expand on that? :)

[bcolflesh]

He can't say any more - THEY ARE ALWAYS WATCHING.

[DrDoc]

I think I'll go put on my tin foil hat! :o

[cicru]

maybe google is run by aliens ..

[DrDoc]

Nah... just the bot...

[bcolflesh]

Actually, the:

Trilateral Commission - trilateral.org/
and
Freemasons - americanatheist.org/supplement/conspiracy.html

run Google from their headquarters at the:

SOA (WHISC) - soaw.org/new/

Even stupid people know that.

[ken_b]

:)

When I first saw the new Mars photos theother day I though...."hmmmm.... that looks like a desert junk yard.... isn'tthatan Edsel over there on the left?"

:)

[Kirby]

>He can't say any more - THEY ARE ALWAYS WATCHING.

Too late. His profile gives him away.

The night of the moon landing was a Sunday night and they pre-empted "The Wonderful World Of Disney" showing Peter Pan. I was one pi**ed off 7 year old.

[Herenvardo]

...and you're not going to expand on that? :)

>He can't say any more - THEY ARE ALWAYS WATCHING.
Too late. His profile gives him away.

Maybe it's risky. My profile gives all info CIA would need to finish me. So at least, I wont let the secrets get buried with me. I will try to sumarize.
Since Galileo Galilei invented the telescope (17th century, if I remmeber well), many people have reported some lights moving on the moons surface. More recently, they got recorded on video, and I've seen some of these videos: A line of circular lights, flying at perfect formation, went sporadically from one point to another on moon's surface.
Some unidentified flying objects were reported during the 50's, and the race began. Sputnik, Apollo, etc... a lot of non-tripulated ships reached the moon and at the early 60's all its surface had been pictured.
Amstrong reached the moon, it's true. The video was a farse becouse the true video held too many secrets. There is a 14min video that someone filtered and was published in Televisión Española. Maybe it's all a farse, but it had a lot more of credibility that any information published by NASA. And it also gives the oportunity to understand some things that have kept unexplained (as the questions I posted yesterday).
At the beginning, the video was a walk on the moon as everybody imagines it. Two men in their suits, almost floating on the surface, picking up some rocks, etc. Until they reached it: a high wall, a perfect rectangle. Everybody who has seen it agree that it couldn't be a natural creation. And it was the beginning, it was only the front wall of some kind of building. The reporter described it as an abandoned hangar and I couldn't describe it better.
Both astronauts entered there, took some samples of rocks and leaved. In the feet of the module that remained on the surface, they left a note saying that they had gone peacefully... a new lie of NASA. The next missions to the moon discharged a lot of nuclear weapons over that structure, and all similar places detected... untill an Apollo exploded and the NASA never returned to the moon...
Apart of this video, there is some data published by NASA that makes it more credible: When the ship was landing on the moon, Armstrong's heart reached 156 pulsations per minute... completely normal in such a situation. But there was a moment during the walk when they reached 161ppm suddenly. NASA explaining that the cause was the weigth of the rocks picked by the astronauts, but not everybody believed this. Among two persons, 50kg of rocks where picked; this means around 25kg per person. If we care that Earth's gravity is 9.8 and moon's one is 1.6, we can make a simple calculation: 25kg of mass on the moon have the same weigth that 4~5kg of mass on the Earth. Has somebody reached such a cardiac rythm by carryng 5kg? Once again, NASA was simply lying. Is most credible that Armstrong's heart accelerated when he saw that structure.
As I've said, all that video could be a trick created by TV, but it explains many thing better than NASA. I believe it, you can do what you want.

Greetings,
Herenvardö

[georgeek]

...a high wall, a perfect rectangle...

I can explain that...

In the film 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) Lunar explorers uncover an obelisk of alien origin. The director Stanley Kubrick was determined that the obelisk that featured in the film should never become an object of worship so he ordered it to be destroyed. Little did he know that the contractor employed for this task was abducted by aliens in the process of removing it from the film lot. The aliens thought that it would be a great joke to plant it near the proposed landing site for Apollo 11. Sure enough the following year on July 20th 1969 Neil Armstrong stepped onto the surface of the moon and that is what he saw. It's absolutely nothing to worry about...it was meant as a joke.

[Kirby]

Dang censors! If they had shown that wall, I wouldn't have been so ticked about missing Peter Pan.

[Herenvardo]

It's absolutely nothing to worry about...it was meant as a joke.

Wow! Maybe if NASA had known it, they wouldn't have bombed the moon's surface!
In any case, humans blasted their structures without any provocation. And we were suposed to be paceful... something to think about.

Returning to the topic:
That fotos are interesting. It would have been easy for NASA to create that "mars" foto from one of the Earth. But it would have been inverse: how are you sure that the Earth foto was not created by modifying mars one, to get more traffic for the page?
I'm not asking you to believe in NASA, but also, do not believe in the first who counters NASA! Take a look at the photos: from each one is very easy to obtain the other...
There is many people around there who make bussiness by spreading more lies than even NASA, and this could be the case. Of course, I'm not sure. But if you do not believe in NASA, ¿how do you believe in a completely unknown webmaster?

Greetings,
Herenvardö

[knighty]

Humor

3 a : that quality which appeals to a sense of the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous b : the mental faculty of discovering, expressing, or appreciating the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous c : something that is or is designed to be comical or amusing