Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Thanks, Google, for making horizontal AdLinks available a few weeks back. On one of my sites, horizontal AdLinks have increased my CTR by 5X or more, with revenue from that site up accordingly. Before horizontal AdLinks, I tried almost everything else, including vertical AdLinks, and nothing really worked. I was removing underperforming, or non-performing, ad units from page after page. It got to be so bad that I was seriously thinking of dropping Adsense from the site entirely. Then Google made horizontal AdLinks available, which changed everything. I have renewed hope of successfully monetizing the site. This motivates me to continue working hard at it.
Thanks, too, for listening to publishers. When vertical AdLinks were first made available several months ago, one or two persons requested the horizontal AdLinks variety. I didn't think much of it at the time, and the request elicited little comment in the Adsense forum. But Google listened, got to work, and horizontal AdLinks were the result. On a hunch, I tried horizontal AdLinks. Their performance was miraculous.
Okay, so Google could be more responsive in general, but in the case of horizontal AdLinks, I say: Thanks for listening. Thanks for reacting. Good job!
adlinks are useless for most and the person has to click twice for you to earn anything. some people have a hard time getting just one click, nevermind two.
If I substitute the unobtrusive, low-profile horizontal AdLinks for a more in-your-face, garish conventional ad unit, I think I've reduced my visitors annoyance level, not increased it.
The proof is in the pudding. For over three weeks now, horizontal AdLinks (in the "hot spot," above the fold, centered, just before the main page content) have outperformed anything else I've tried by 5X or more. If users are annoyed in general, I don't think they would continue clicking as they have.
This is great feedback. We’re glad to hear you’ve had a positive experience using the new horizontal link unit. As you mentioned in your post, we try to improve and develop products based on the suggestions provided by our publishers.
WebmasterWorld is one of the ‘forums’ (literally and figuratively) where we get to hear your feedback and ideas for future offerings, which we greatly appreciate. So, basically, keep on writing about what you want!
-ASA
if you want to piss your visitors off then use them.. most people think they are normal links to other parts of the site only to be sent elsewhere.adlinks are useless for most and the person has to click twice for you to earn anything. some people have a hard time getting just one click, nevermind two.
That's an opinion many of us simply don't share.
My site generates a ton of feedback a day (more than I can reply to) and I've never heard a single negative comment about AdLinks, EVER. Visitors do click twice, and I had a 30% earnings increase to prove it.
Check out this thread, many said their income went up a bunch:
[webmasterworld.com...]
Would you like some salt to go with that crow?
TO: Celicaphile
Oh yeah, forgot gray, doesn't blend in either for me
:-)
Apologies I didn't get back to you before the weekend. I just wanted to let you know I’ve passed along your feedback about allowing publishers to use a wider variety of background colors for AFS boxes.
howiejs - I’ve also passed your suggestion about allowing multiple link units to the product team.
These are exactly the kinds of suggestions we are interested in, so thanks for sharing your ideas so quickly.
-ASA
Thank you very much! I have seen premium publishers are allowed to modify the Google search boxes so I know Google is not 100% against it. It would be nice to be able to blend the search boxes into our sites as well as the ads. As noted in the recent webinar the more blended the ads are with site content, the less chance of ad-blindness. Being able to integrate the Google search box would seem to be a logical progression as well.