Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

More advertiser control is working extremely well

at least for me...

         

birdstuff

11:52 am on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just as EFV, myself and others had long predicted, the move by Google to give advertisers more control over which sites are allowed to display their ads is helping the bottom line, at least for me.

It's helping me as a publisher because the CPM and total earnings for most of my sites are both up big time, and the change began to take place literally within hours of Google's announcement. Advertisers clearly like my sites, and that not only gives me a warm fuzzy feeling about the future of my AdSense account, it also means the content network should be growing stronger in the eyes of Google.

Just one guy's report...

blairsp

1:32 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Beg to differ. My understanding is that advertisers opt OUT of sites rather than in. They merely dislike other sites more than they like/dislike yours. Other sites being removed by advertisers are driving up the price on sites which haven't been removed like yours. As ever anyone can correct me if my logic is flawed

cyanweb

2:14 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



actually advertisers can now pick what sites they want to be seen on... look at adwords homepage down bottom - next to red NEW! - "Site targeting on the content network: Pick the exact sites where your AdWords ads appear. Learn more."

i agree that the changes have had a positive effect for us... a lot more "flux" over 24hr periods - but averages out pretty good...

Bluepixel

2:31 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As my adsense ads are only shown on a regional search engine, my ecpm dropped to about half of what it was before.

I think the new adsense extensions are a great thing and will help many people, allthough it doesn't help me, since my traffic is far too small, so that advertisers will select my site from their control panel.

I guess my site just have to grow until I reach enough impressions to qualify for a search partner account, allthough this will never happen. I'm pretty sure about that :)

And I want to add that if google would take time to check on which sites their ads are shown on and disable offender accounts, the advertisers wouldn't even have to select sites which they want their ads to be shown on.

europeforvisitors

2:37 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)



I don't believe the "site-targeted" CPM ads have rolled out yet (they were still in beta at last report), but it's possible that some sites are getting targeted ads from advertisers who are in the beta program.

As for whether the opt-out list is helping some sites while hurting others, that's certainly a possibility, especially for keyphrases where a lot of inventory gets sucked up by megasites that don't convert well for advertisers. (I remember seeing posts on the AdWords forum a while back about a weather site and a mapping sites that were delivering tons of traffic with zero conversions. The sites were legitimate, but their referrals were worthless to the advertisers who posted.) This just goes to show that the "traffic mix" can have an impact on EPC, CTR, eCPM, and total earnings.

My own eCPM is up noticeably--about 16% for the month to date, compared to last month--but that's due mostly to a significantly higher clickthrough rate since the Bourbon update started on the weekend of May 21. My EPC is actually down about 4.5% MTD compared to the same period last month.

wgonz

2:45 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"...not only gives me a warm fuzzy feeling about the future of my AdSense account, it also means the content network should be growing stronger in the eyes of Google..."

I feel it the same way.

I think this is a great Google move. Seems like Google keeps months/years ahead competitors.

birdstuff

3:38 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Beg to differ. My understanding is that advertisers opt OUT of sites rather than in. They merely dislike other sites more than they like/dislike yours. Other sites being removed by advertisers are driving up the price on sites which haven't been removed like yours. As ever anyone can correct me if my logic is flawed.

Actually, I don't think we're disagreeing here. When advertisers drop poor quality sites that leaves more of the "advertiser budget pie" for the rest of us. If they're happy with your sites and opt out of others, it can only benefit you IMO, and my experience seems to bear that out.

sailorjwd

3:51 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There are so many scrapper sites to block that most adwords advertisers can fill up their 25 slots/campaign rather quickly. I just added another 10 to my various compaigns and complained to G about the truely fraudulent ones (yes, that's my job).

Birdstuff, maybe your site is like mine - the lesser of two weavels.

birdstuff

9:42 am on Jun 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Nope, I sold off all of my weavel sites years ago.