Forum Moderators: martinibuster
The collected money is distributed amongst all the authors and musicans.
But are not all AdSense publishers also authors?
We can all proof the success of our author work by the advertising revenues. So we should also receive shares from this "Urheberrechtsabgabe".
But the term "publisher" does indeed have (at least) two different meanings. A publisher in the context of copyright is the owner of the copyright. A publisher in the context of AdSense is someone displaying ads on a web page. There's no conceptual (let alone monetary) connection between the two.
I'm not sure about the different ways to take part in this fee system. I think you need to be a member of one of the collecting organisations ("Verwertungsgesellschaften"). For the registration of text content, the "VG Wort" (www.vgwort.de) would be the most likely candidate. But I have no idea whether they will accept online content for registration in their system.
I'm not sure about the different ways to take part in this fee system. I think you need to be a member of one of the collecting organisations ("Verwertungsgesellschaften"). For the registration of text content, the "VG Wort" (www.vgwort.de) would be the most likely candidate.
Many of us AdSense publishers earn more than some highly hyped authors.
For example literature nobel price of 2004, Elfride Jelinek stated about her future: "Now I can live from my writings alone".
This means she was before not able to live from her earnings as an author alone.
We advertising financed authors are a new type of literature and publishing, so we should challenge this system.
In contrast:
In sum, I doubt there is any need for you to envy the paper based publishers for whatever small extra share they get from the sale of photo copiers etc...