Forum Moderators: martinibuster
...I was going to say "reprehensible" instead of "bad", but I have to admit I have contemplated doing that myself now and then, so it would be hypocritical to take that strong a position on the subject.
For a long time now we have had a frame buster on our site. Simple javascript that helps prevent the site from getting framed. We checked that site again and their frame idea does not work to well on our site (not at all actually). I suggest you pick one up.
Even works to keep Jeeves from framing.
>Are they showing AdSense ads in the frame surrounding linked sites?
Yes, Jomax they are. Apparently half the site though is hijacking full index pages from other sites and framing them with Adsense also. Differing metas from the hijacked site. The other half is a typical Adsense scraper that frames all links on the page. They have about 2,000 pages in Yahoo. What few they have in Google seem mainly penalized. It’s more than me effected.
Arubicus I did keep track of frame busters a couple of years back in the forums but never utilized one.
It makes me wonder if anything isn’t being hijacked but I guess that goes without saying. To me it seems to be getting out of hand lately.
So are we saying that framing a site so that they have ads, and our sites show psa's is a violation?
I just looked at the site, and it seems that most of the content AND the google ads are gone. I'm assuming that Google must have caught up with them, and there is now no need for the meagre content they did have.
So are we saying that framing a site so that they have ads, and our sites show psa's is a violation?
I wrote to Google about a competitor doing this, incluging MY site, wrote to Google
They gave me lip service about sending my complaint to the "investigative team" which is google-speak for DELETED, could give a rats ass.
I dropped in the script to bust frames, done.
2. You would be surprised how many people do it to you. When I looked last month (checking for 302s, and this example is not one) I found about.com did a nice line in framing sites and adding their own ads.
They have about 2,000 pages in Yahoo. What few they have in Google seem mainly penalized. It’s more than me effected.
What people do with their own sites is their own business IMHO, but once they're TAKING your site it IS your business, and Yahoo seems to take their QC very seriously.
It irritates me because I knew some of these Adsense scrapers were going to get more and more aggressive about stealing other people’s content with Yahoo’s current algo. Plus there’s an advantage to Google doing nothing about it. I was expecting it to get worse though.
Marcia I share your sentiments on the second half.
Larry how is that script working out in Jeeves?
<BODY onLoad="if (top!= self) top.location.replace(self.location.href);"
TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#efeeee" etc. etc. >
Here are my site rankings in SERPS:
- - - - - GG YH Jeeves
kw1 only: 18 11 13
kw1+kw2 : 5 1 12
I see no visible damage whatsoever.
Google sends the majority of SE referrals, Yahoo maybe half as many, MSN around 22%.
Ask Jeeves/Teoma send a handful of visitors at most, way way down the list.
When I click on the AJ redir, their page shows mine framed, then POOF AJ is gone and my
full page is all that shows. No complaints at all. -Larry
if (top.location!= location) {
top.location.replace(self.location.href);
}
Ahh this one is much better. The one in the previous is an old one that has a rash with IE and the back button. It busts the frame but the back button sends you back to the page that framed you which gets busted...
This is the one I use on my complete site (except the index page which has now been updated)
The back button isn't broken, it takes you back BEFORE the AJ redirect, no richochet effect,
i.e. to the AJ page with your phony link on it. No tennis-ball effect.
This is one of the most useful things I learned on this forum.
A major site / organization in my odd niche decided to frame a number of the better sites.
I enjoyed passing around the 'fix', though few actually used it. - Larry
I go to Ask Jeeves and search for my own url, then click through. The site's in the AJ frame.
Now, on my main page, there are adsense ads showing up that are not even the same color or layout I specified when setting up the code in my AS account. they're the blue border, white background ads.
What's up with that?
I can understand the ads not being targeted because the site's in a frame, but are those $%^&* replacing my adsense with their own some how?
K
but are those $%^&* replacing my adsense with their own some how?
No this was discussed last year and was confirmed that askjeeves are not changing the publisher account number for their own
[webmasterworld.com...]
Arubicus I already picked up on your frame buster from the link. I'm going to test Larry's and yours. Thanks.
I have contacted the adsense team twice regarding askjeeves and the possibility of any adsense click not being credited to my account, I was advised that there is no problems and askjeeves will "NOT" get the credit for any clicks from my site while it's being framed
On the second occasion what concerned me was the name of my site was not in the URL of the adsense when framed by askjeeves, it was showing a URL containing askjeeves when you mouse over the ads, again I was advised that this is nothing to worry about and I "WILL" get the credit for any clicks
What I don't like with the framing of my site is when I have a coloured border around the adsense layout as this changes the look and layout of the site, It should be a white border on a white background.
I have since added the frame buster script to stop this from happening.
The question - how many users have their javascript off? my estimates are that it is up to 20%. Does anybody have any stats?
One note about that JS framebusting... It can prevent your site from being accessed via online translators. Very user-unfriendly. With these Javascript snippets you can explicitly exclude some domain names from being "busted" out of, and I recommend you do.