Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.160.163.163

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

image ads

wow - beautiful ads

     

Fairla

2:07 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've finally seen some Adsense image ads on my site, and they're the most beautiful ads I've ever seen. Well targeted to my site, too. I got a couple clicks today, something that rarely happens with Adsense on my site lately, so I guess visitors are noticing the ads, too! I have never seen nicer ads online. I hope Google will keep this up.

bts111

2:19 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am also impressed with the creative that is displayed on my sites.

Google QAC's are doing a very good job.

flobaby

2:40 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I guess it depends on who's making the ad. Your posts inspired me to add an image skyscraper to my site just now.

What I got was exactly this on a white background:
----------
CLICK HERE

$5.99

DOMAIN

NAMES

NO CATCH

$5.99
$5.99
$5.99
$5.99
---------

My dog could've made a better ad and I don't even have a dog.

[edited by: flobaby at 2:51 am (utc) on May 5, 2005]

Jenstar

2:47 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jenstar is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



I have also seen some excellent image ad creatives as well - one prompted me to visit her site (no, I didn't click my own ad, incase you were wondering ;) )

europeforvisitors

3:44 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



I don't see too many image ads on my site, but the ones that I do see always look professional.

I suspect that most image ads come from ad agencies and corporate advertisers who wouldn't be caught dead buying text ads that look like classified ads in newspapers.

flobaby

3:49 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When I checked out the properties of my aforementioned butt-ugly ad, it was a CJ link. So I've not given up, just put the url in the filter and hopefully I'll get those gorgeous ads you guys and gals are seeing.

ken_b

3:50 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member ken_b is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Flobaby; Was that an image ad, or CPM expanded text ad?

From your post it kinda looks like it could be the "expanded text" version.

flobaby

3:53 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No, it was actually a truly crappy image ad, done in plain Arial, like a third grader made it as a spelling project.

flobaby

3:56 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hey, I put the page in my Profile, check it out.

Edited: I took the url down.
Nothing to see here, move away from the post...

[edited by: flobaby at 4:28 am (utc) on May 5, 2005]

ken_b

4:01 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member ken_b is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I see what ya mean.

flobaby

4:04 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yeah, it's an insult to my fine taste. But it gives me a great way to waste time #*$!ing and moaning while our stats are down. :-)

weela

4:23 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Odd, Iím seeing a grey box with seven ad units in it. I used (google_ad_type = "image";) only, doesnít look much like an image ad to me.

flobaby

4:27 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That does sound weird. Post the page in your profile, give us something else to gawk at.

Jenstar

4:39 am on May 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jenstar is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



Image ads are not supposed to mimic text ads:

Your image ads may not contain screenshots of text ads or otherwise simulate a text ad in any way.

A few must have gotten through, or one of the approval checkers didn't know that this was a criteria for image ads.

send2paul

7:33 pm on May 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The image ads do look nice, although as of today I was still getting a 120 X 600 skyscraper image ad for an internet meeting that was occuring on the 29th April.

Maybe Adsense needs to a bit of "housekeeping" on the image ads if they're date related? :)

david_uk

9:04 pm on May 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Thanks to the comments about the quality of the creatives in this thread, I'm giving the image ads a go on a couple of pages that the conventional ads don't work on. I'll report back with the results when available.

send2paul

6:20 am on May 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



David,

I also tried the small horizontal adsense "image & text" banner for ashort time.

Although it did appear, it didn't seem to be as visually effective as the skyscaper ad. The horizontal ad looked just like that - "a horizontal ad", whereas the skyscraper ad made you want to look at it and wonder "what on earth is is?!" - which is exactly the "clickable effect" you desire ;)

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month