Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Immune To Google Ads?

Your thoughts...

         

spyder_tek

8:44 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Are people starting to develop an immunity towards Google ads?

Given the widespread use of Google AdSense ads, do other programs out-perform Google in terms of CTR?

What are your thoughts on this?

howiejs

9:39 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



we will go from banner-blindness to text link blindness . . .

I don't remember how many years it took back in the good old dotcom days?

Liane

9:55 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I so dislike Google adsense ads that as soon as a page begins to download and I can see the typical images loading on both sides of the screen with minimal content in the center ... I can't hit that back key fast enough!

Zygoot

10:07 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If Google would give us publishers far greater control about the ads appearance then we should be able to greatly reduce the 'Adsense blindness' effect.

vabtz

10:11 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



I want to make mine blink

Liane

10:12 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I want to make mine blink

LOL ... good one!

icedowl

10:18 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just saw one ad on my main site that got me interested. Good writing on the advertiser's part! Of course, I wouldn't dream of clicking it - but - I may just go find it by other means. :)

europeforvisitors

10:28 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)




we will go from banner-blindness to text link blindness . . .

I don't remember how many years it took back in the good old dotcom days?

Banner blindness occurred because the vast majority of ad banners were run-of-network ads that weren't related to the pages on which they ran. Not only that, but many banners were (and are) for dating services, Internet casinos, and the like.

Contextual text ads are different. They're like ads in enthusiast and trade publications. Such "endemic ads," to use a buzzword, add value to content pages in the same way that on-topic advertisements in QST AMATEUR RADIO and BOATING add value to those special-interest publications.

At least, that's how contextual ads are supposed to work. Whether they actually do work that way depends on the ads, the content, and the audience. I'd guess that an ad for cruise deals on a cruising site, or for high-capacitance widgets on a widget circuit-design site, would be much less subject to "ad blindness" than whatever ads Google can find to stick on news pages at Washingtonpost.com or NYTimes.com.

moltar

11:01 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Banner blindness was caused mostly by annoying banners. A few networks were dominating the market, and all you could see is the same 10-20 banners taking 80% of all the banner network. Those banners were, of course, filled with annoying animation and interactivity. Or even worse java applets and flash. Do you remember "hit the monkey" days? People just got fed up with the same thing, and started to ignore them.

With adsense it's a whole other story. The ads are on topic (most of the time). They are text ads. They don't blink or annoy the user in most cases.

Sometimes website authors take it to the extreme and insert 20 banners on one page. Splitting content in half with a banner that is out of website color scheme, to make it really stand out. But I find that it's generally a very clean network and it should not burn out. After all G hires the best people and I trust them they know what they are doing. After all there were lots of mistakes made in the past, and it's time to learn from them.

mike schmitz

11:51 pm on Mar 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think you discount Google's ability to continue to refine it's targeting ability. Yes, people will grow used to Adsense and it's competitors, but I think Google is making strides to continue to make sponsors a real 'content' like item to add to a website - not just revenue.

Added to that, most people are really stupid and barely know that the CD isn't a cupholder and I think text ads are here to stay.

M

1milehgh80210

12:15 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This recent (over)advertising of the web has led me to feel a general 'ad fatigue', and generally I tune out/ignore most web advertising I see.
Actually adsense ads are about the least obtrusive, so very easy to ignore.

europeforvisitors

12:38 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



Actually adsense ads are about the least obtrusive, so very easy to ignore.

Not that easy, to judge from Google's most recent earnings statement. :-)

conroy

3:14 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Our perspectives are completely biased. We know all the layouts for the ads, we can spot an adsense ad from a mile away. Top top it off, most people here are scared so bad that they won't even click an AS ad on any site.

Since publishers are taught to NEVER EVER even THINK about clicking on their own ads (and rightfully so), when publishers see them on another site, that basic instinct is still there.

The public (99.9999% of internet users) are most certainly not immune to google ads and they don't ignore them, unless you make them look like a banner ad.

Soso

9:58 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't know about you, but I've already developed Google Ads blindness. I just don't read the ads text consciously, no matter how much is it blended into the page desing.