Forum Moderators: martinibuster
That is where the url shown in the browser address bar window is the domain name which has redirected to another site, not the active websites url.
Which is best from the standpoint of SE ranking and indexing, masked redirect or regular redirect? Is there any difference in G for example indexing the redirected from domain?
[edited by: trader at 6:18 pm (utc) on Feb. 9, 2005]
Problem 1: Google and other bots will most likely continue to recognize the old domain.
Problem 2: No one will be able to bookmark individual pages from newdomain.com - they can only bookmark the top of the site.
You probably should use a server side 301 redirect from old to new - except with the problems with new sites entering the Google SERPs - I would seriously reconsider changing your domain name at this time.
Referring to doing that with hundreds of domains where we want to redirect to other related active web-sites but the websurfer or visitor will think the domain has its own website due to the address bar showing the domain name, not the website url.
That is a lot easier and cheaper than creating hundreds of new sites for each unused domain but still gets type-in traffic.
this code is in the new domain name, will I have problem with this?
Als do I have to add keywords + title on the new one?
Or is it better to change my account by google?
Thanks for help