Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.159.105.39

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Image ads or not?

     
4:46 pm on Jan 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 5, 2002
posts:1855
votes: 3


Has anyone been able to determine how image ads perform compared to text ads?

- Grant

5:41 pm on Jan 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 1, 2004
posts:426
votes: 0


Image ads perform the same way your regular banner ads perform. Poorly.

Text is the way to go.

6:28 pm on Jan 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:Oct 27, 2001
posts:10210
votes: 0


Banners can perform quite well, if they're targeted to the audience and/or the page topic. (Most banners perform poorly simply because they're run-of-network garbage, such as the mortage and dating-service banners that one sees on newspaper sites.)

In any case, the question is probably academic for most AdSense publishers, because so far there doesn't seem to be an overwhelming demand for image ads. I expect we'll see more if and when Google succeeds in marketing AdSense to large mainstream corporate advertisers and ad agencies.

6:36 pm on Jan 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 5, 2002
posts:1855
votes: 3


Yeah I've only seen one on my site. Disabling them though.

- Grant

7:42 pm on Jan 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 8, 2005
posts:3
votes: 0


I never tested it in that amount, that I could make a reliable statement.

I expect that text ads perform better, because they canbe better integrated into the content and aren't highlighted that much as advertisement as Image-Ads are. Regular image ads normally suffer from banner-blindness, too.

Due to the better matching I expect that Image-Ads on Google perform better than Image-Ads from any other regular advertising network.

Best Regards
Remo Uherek