Forum Moderators: martinibuster
"Advertisers participating in Google's contextual advertising network have seen a 50 percent increase in their return on investment in the past year, the company said yesterday."
Here is the full article:
[dmnews.com...]
Advertisers who limit themselves to AdWords are leaving a lot of money on the table.
Advertisers who limit themselves to AdWords are leaving a lot of money on the table.
That's right. And it doesn't matter if search has a higher ROI. It only matters that both ROIs are positive. I may make an average of 20 cents for every 10 cents I spend in search and only 15 cents for every 10 cents I spend in content, but it still makes economic sense to play both. Especially if search is as limited as AWA says (which I'll take her word for it).
The article quotes her as saying that "search sites comprise just 5 percent of page views on the Internet."
I tend to agree with that statement as I rarely use any search engine to find something. After 10+ years of being online my 'favorites' list has grown to be rather large, and quite often I just find new sites by following links.