Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Adsense Spam

         

rfontaine

8:35 pm on Dec 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It seems like the internet is overun with websites that have little or no real content - rather, the entire intention of these sites is obviously to have google ads displayed.

These crap sites pervade every subject and its getting really out of hand. Many sites use decieving methods to get people to click on the ads. People often think the ads are part of the regular navigation. I have seen alot of entire directories built around adsense with no honest content, even sites that look and feel like ecommerce sites selling large inventories of products but actually only have google ads for income.

I don't know about you, but if I were a google advertiser I wouldn't want my good name attached with this rubbish, not to mention the quality of the clicks from many of these sites must be poor. In fact, I bet alot the clicks origonate from the website owners themselves.

What do you guys think about this google adsense spam junk which is overunning the internet?

Hugene

9:40 pm on Dec 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



the quality of the clicks from many of these sites must be poor. In fact, I bet alot the clicks origonate from the website owners themselves.

First, not so sure about the poorness of the clicks. Anyways, if we only rely on surfers to click when they are sure they'll buy, then we'll all be really poor (which we are anyways) Marketing is about building up and creating a need.

Second, when you have a adsense spam site, I dont think you'll be stupid enough to generate false clicks on it too; so point 2 is rubish

Finally, everybody seems to forget the service that publishers are giving advertisers, even with spam sites. Basically, tehse spam sites collect natural traffic from obscure or different searches that the advertiser would never have thought of. If it wasnt for that, then the advertisres would just come up with all the possible searches that might affect them and advertise on the serps only. But you see, that is impossible, and that's why a web of publishers serving ads is priceless for advertisers: it allows them to reach a marekt that would otherwise forever remain closed to them

europeforvisitors

10:19 pm on Dec 18, 2004 (gmt 0)



everybody seems to forget the service that publishers are giving advertisers, even with spam sites.

Spend some time in the AdWords forum, and you'll begin to understand that not all advertisers want or benefit from the "service" that made-for-AdSense sites (a.k.a. spam sites) are giving them.

In any case, made-for-AdSense sites are against the Google TOS, so why bother to defend them?

rfontaine

2:26 pm on Dec 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am not saying there are no good sites that also have google ads. What I am saying is there are a great many sites merely slapped together for google money that contain no real content but clog up search results and even trick visitors into clicking ads they do not want to, thinking they are part of the navigation. It has happened to me a number of times, and almost always I immediately click away when I realize my error - costing the advertiser money for no return.

Also, how much you wanna bet those google spammers are clicking away on their own ads every chance they get. There are many ways to do this so that it seems legit.

rfontaine

3:40 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



All good stuff. I think Google is dropping the ball by letting all this adsense rubbish in.

gmac17

4:58 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



and there is no way they can put the genie back in the bottle, especially now that they are a public company.

ogletree

5:05 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It would be so easy to catch the majority of the adsense spam sites. They all follow a very unnatual pattern. They all get their words from word tracker. There are some real obscure phrases that now have thousands of results when a year ago had like 12. G could clean them out in a heartbeat with very little or no splatter affect to legit sites. I could make a very simple algo if they want one.

UK_Web_Guy

9:43 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Have read all the posts in this thread - who decides what is spam and want isn't?

It's all just opinion - if google considers something as spam they will deal with it.

Definition of SPAM - Someone Positioned Above Me

Merry christmas to all!

europeforvisitors

10:01 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)



Have read all the posts in this thread - who decides what is spam and want isn't?

Ultimately, the advertisers and prospective advertisers do.

photonstudios

11:29 pm on Dec 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Definition of SPAM - Someone Positioned Above Me

I love that one! LOL

dmz17

8:39 am on Dec 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I recently discovered that Verizon's Superpages engages in SERP Spam. They create static copies of Google's SERPs with telltale urls like .../web~SRC_google~C_Coffee+Shops~T_Houston...

You would think they would be satisfied with their own content. Is that outrageous or what?

They also have an active web crawler.

This 40 message thread spans 2 pages: 40