Forum Moderators: martinibuster
annoying? I've seen intellitxt a couple times. didn't seem that bad to me. maybe i didnt see enough of it to get the same impression, though.
Maybe it depends on the type of content. I find it very annoying in editorial body text, because the ToolTip-style text ads don't disappear instantly when you move the cursor. The slight lag is just enough to interfere with reading of the body text.
About six months ago I went to an IntelliTXT example page to see what it looked like. As the page downloaded I realised with horror that I must have picked up some AdWare.
Then I realised that the double-underlined links were IntelliTXT.
It wouldn't be so off-putting if AdWare networks hadn't started using the same technique about 12 months before.
"We do not permit Google ads or search boxes accessing Google search services to be published on web pages that also contain what could be considered competing ads or services....If you have elected to receive content-based Google ads, this would also include all other content-targeted ads."
Seems pretty clear to me.
But I do see pages running them both simultaneously, and dropped G a line from this third party site's feedback on the Adsense ads. Checked a few weeks later and the page is no longer running Intellxt. Maybe they removed it after G pointed it out to them. Who knows?