Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.244.45

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Theory on Goooooooooogle

Catch impersonators?

     
8:19 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 25, 2003
posts:367
votes: 0


If this theory was posited on the "Ads by Gooooooogle" thread, then my apologies in advance. It's just too long for me to read the entire thing to find out if someone else was wondering this.

Suppose Google wanted to catch people that were displaying ads that weren't AdSense/AdWords ads, but claiming that they were? Perhaps the impostors wanted to add an air of legitimacy to their non-Google ads? Or maybe they were rejected by the AdSense program and are trying to make another ad program look more prestigious?

By changing the "Ads by Google" line to "Ads by Gooooogle". They could search their own indices to rapidly find people that were using the "Ads by Google" phrase and make them stop. They could have done this before, and then cross-referenced the pages with their "approved" AdSense sites/pages, but that would have been a monumental job. This makes it a lot easier.

Just a thought.

Thanks.

8:55 pm on Sept 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 18, 2003
posts:827
votes: 0


They can do that already. The JS is not interpreted by GoogleBot.
9:10 pm on Sept 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 22, 2003
posts:1483
votes: 0


Perhaps they found the over-optimization penalty on anchor text was hurting their ranking for ads [google.com]. ;)
9:12 pm on Sept 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jenstar is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 22, 2002
posts:4663
votes: 0


That is an interesting idea. Many of the other contextual advertisers make their ad units look like AdSense, complete with the "Ads by _____". With the current Gooooooooogle, it definitely makes one notice that they are Google ads, and not a competitor.
11:54 pm on Sept 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 1, 2004
posts:238
votes: 0


I think they should have used a Google logo if they want to draw attention to their brand. I think the oooooo's are a bad fix to a good idea.

m

2:37 am on Sept 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 8, 2004
posts:527
votes: 0


mike, great minds think alike and I too thought a small, discrete Google logo would be a nice OPTION.
3:49 am on Sept 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 10, 2004
posts:52
votes: 0


much like the logo provided for the google search option.
3:43 pm on Sept 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 29, 2004
posts:31
votes: 0



I have not seen multiple Ad units serverd on "Ads by Google" Page.

Whereas "Ads by Goooooooooogle" Servers multiple ads, if coded.

1:35 am on Sept 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Moderator from AU 

WebmasterWorld Administrator anallawalla is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 3, 2003
posts:3701
votes: 3


I'd love to know what Google's legal counsel had to say about this idea. They are diluting their trademark. Someone could register domains with the extra Os and it would get harder for Google to challenge them.