Forum Moderators: martinibuster
- On a page that has the phrase "Murano glass chandelier" deep in the body text, AdSense insists on displaying ads for Murano glass and the Nissan Murano.
- On a page about restaurants and dining that mentions the hotel's own smoked salmon, there are ads for smoked salmon.
- On a page about suites, the ads are for hotels in New Orleans and New York.
In other words, 50% of the pages in that article are displaying mistargeted ads. The only explanation I can think of is that the Mediabot is sometimes plucking keyphrases at random from body text while ignoring titles, headlines, and other obvious clues that it thinks a publisher might try to manipulate. The best solution I can think of would be for Google to:
1) Allow publishers to supply helper keywords (positive and/or negative) to help with targeting on evergreen pages that consistently show mistargeted ads; and/or...
2) Pay more attention to page titles, headlines, and similar clues except in cases where heavily abused keywords and keyphrases come into play.
I guess that AdSesne uses a similar algorithm to the main Google SERPS in deciding what a page is "about". So AdSense targetting quality will vary in the same way as SERPS quality varies when the Googlers tweak the algorithm.
One of the things Google seems to have been doing over the last year is reducing the value given to TITLE and Hx tags.
My favourite mismatch to date was a page about creatures such as the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot that insisted on showing an ad for... a Neil Diamond singalike!
No reference to diamonds or singing or anything like that. Since it's not a common type of ad I just blocked the URL.
I'm wondering if the same thing that is delaying our stats is also delaying the updating of ads on new pages.
I would like to see an update to AdSense where they allow us to choose the keywords we want to target for specific pages, and any pages we HAVEN'T explicitly defined in the system would get "content matched". I've mentioned this to Google and they seemed like it was something they would consider doing, but maybe they were just being nice and have no plans for it.
I know there are probably some "commercial" sites out there who would love to start using AdSense but don't want to put their competitors ads on their pages - which is what content matching would do. If they could specify a similar category to display ads for I think AdSense would pick up a lot more users. For example, a web hosting company may not offer web stats or design - with this suggestion, they could show AdSense ads for THOSE categories instead of other web hosts.
I've given up on trying to control this with ad blocking in all but the most bizzare cases.
I would like to see an update to AdSense where they allow us to choose the keywords we want to target for specific pages, and any pages we HAVEN'T explicitly defined in the system would get "content matched". I've mentioned this to Google and they seemed like it was something they would consider doing, but maybe they were just being nice and have no plans for it.
I would really like to see this. For example on a craft site people aren't interested in the ready made product, they want tools, patterns and instructions for the craft. An algo can't see that.
I think there would be a need to still consider the text on the site so people wouldn't just put popular key words in when it didn't fit the content, but often just a keyword or two within the topic would get more appropriate ads.
Our favourite mismatch was a page about "civic engagement" (volunteering, etc.) that showed an ad about "engagement rings".
In fairness to google, this type of "error" is probably down to the campaigner bidding on "engagement" instead of the more specific "engagement ring". I'm sure that a lot of misplaced adsense is possibly the fault of the campaigner
What a hoot! I'll bet not many would even recognize the page subject miss match
Maybe not, but mismatched ads are a waste of space that could be earning revenue for the publisher--and for Google.
digitalv, for a while, there were a lot of poorly matched ads. It was actually quite awful.It isn't perfect yet but it's much better. I'm making more than ever. You might want to give it one more try.
This was about two weeks ago - have they updated it since then? :)
I think there would be a need to still consider the text on the site so people wouldn't just put popular key words in when it didn't fit the content
So what if they did? AdSense impressions shouldn't hurt AdWords advertisers, if people wanted to load their web pages up with "irrelevant" ads who cares? People aren't going to CLICK them unless they're interested. When no one clicks no one loses, but when someone clicks everyone wins: Google, the Advertiser, and you the AdSense user.
So what if they did? AdSense impressions shouldn't hurt AdWords advertisers, if people wanted to load their web pages up with "irrelevant" ads who cares?
The whole idea behind AdSense is to deliver ads that are relevant to the page's content. If Google allowed publishers to load up their widget or whatsit pages with ads for Viagra, credit cards, or other irrelevant topics, Google's "relevancy" sales pitch would be weakened.
The solution, IMHO, is for Google to allow keywords that help (but aren't a substitute for) the matching algorithm.