Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Average Traffic per $1k

Is this allowed?

         

nuevojefe

10:37 pm on May 22, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm not sure if this violates TOS, but I'm wondering what many of you are experiencing in correlation between traffic and $.

I know we can't get into specifics, but I'd like to know how many visitors most sites need to make each $1,000.00.

Of course the ad topics are going to GREATLY affect that, but If we had an overall ballpark figure it's easier to estimate.

Anyone?

jomaxx

12:13 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"Greatly" is a huge understatement. Clickthrough rate can vary by a factor of more than 10, and so can the earnings per click. The only way to know how it will work on a given site is to test it and see.

alika

12:27 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



All you're going to have is a range -- and a wide range at that. Some sites can earn $1,000 with only 50,000 impressions (or less), while some needs 1 million impressions (or more) to reach that amount.

There are just a number of important factors that can affect the site's capability to earn $1,000 that the ballpark exercise has little value, if at all.

Jenstar

12:45 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



With identical stats, one traffic could make $10000 while the next makes only $1000. It varies that greatly.

fclark

4:13 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One data point for you, possibly an outlier: $1000 per 9000 visitors.

paybacksa

4:30 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I consult to a number of companies with sites running ads, and get to see a few more through friends.

Last month: One site had 50,000 visits/month and daily revenue was not enough to pay for morning coffee. Another site had <100 visits per month and covered the owner's car payment (he has a nice car BTW)

It's all about 1. copy/creative and CTR 2.topic and payout per click 3. type of visitor

(I suggested the 50,000/month site switch to an affiliate program and now it too appears to be sufficient to cover a car payment. It was a rather mature topic area, and ads just didn't match the visitor well.)

Bluepixel

7:38 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Aproximately 300 000 visitors.

daunk

9:17 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



About 3 million. It is on a forum and the ads are all low paying sadly.

Visit Thailand

10:41 am on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't want to upset anyone but I do not see the point in these threads.

When I read that someone needs only 9,000 impressions to make US$ 1000 I think wow what topic is that (perhaps that is the reason for these threads) and when I read that 300,000 impressions are needed I think wow I am doing well.

This will never change even if the algo alters there will always be people doing better than you and others worse.

As people have mentioned before in this thread and others there are simply too many variables.

Bluepixel

3:05 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



it's not 300 000 impressions but visitors :-)

fclark

3:12 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ditto: 9k visitors, not impressions.

Problem is that there is a natural cap on the traffic to this particular site, due to the limited popularity of the topic.

Visit Thailand... I thought this topic was interesting, because even though the revenue/visit from site to site can swing, depending on many factors, it is nice to at least have a rough idea of this range.

I'm trained in statistics and business. When I consider a new business plan, market metrics are useful to me, even if all one has is a range.

Macro

3:30 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't want to upset anyone but I do not see the point in these threads.

VisitThailand, I share your despair at this "white noise".

how many visitors most sites need to make each $1,000.00

I've got an accurate answer for you: You need a total of exactly x visitors to make $1,000.

level80

5:53 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The Google statistics don't supply visitor numbers though - to get that you'd need to know how many page (on average) each visitor saw on your site....

No of clicks to $1000 + topic would be a better metric

in my particular case it's >10,000 clicks or over 1 million impressions with a topic of computer games, skyscraper ads.

photonstudios

8:30 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've made over 1k with only 3,000 unique visitors. One of the most competitive topics though :)

dhatz

9:08 pm on May 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I consult to a number of companies with sites running ads, and get to see a few more through friends.
Last month: One site had 50,000 visits/month and daily revenue was not enough to pay for morning coffee. Another site had <100 visits per month and covered the owner's car payment (he has a nice car BTW)

It's all about 1. copy/creative and CTR 2.topic and payout per click 3. type of visitor

By copy/creative, I assume you refer to the "ad copy", not the creative design of the content page itself, right?

I recently switched off Adsense on a Website, it wasn't making even for the morning coffee as you said (few visitors <500/day, high CTR, very low EPC).

I'm scratching my head about this, but I didn't have time to investigate. Once a Google Adsense support person told me that for the moment they assign "topic" more per site, rather than per page.

Adsense support was always very polite, but I never was able to get an non-canned (ie helpful) answer from them, except once.

Even for obvious bug reports, e.g. the junk chars in non-Latin ads.

paybacksa

12:10 am on May 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



yes, by "ad copy/creative" I meant the ad itself. That is one of the reasons that giving ads that get clicked higher prominance is a good thing. I have seen some really bad ads, which obviously don't help publishers make any money.

nuevojefe

1:43 am on May 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Thanks to those who posted.

To those that don't see the point, that's why you didn't post it. But I have my particular reasons and some of these (constructive)responses have helped.

BwanaZulia

12:46 pm on May 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You also ahve to factor in the size, placement and colors of the ads.

I have websites that would need 210,000 to reach $1,000 and another that needs just 62,000 to reach $1,000 of ad revenue.

Those two sites are two totally different topics (cars vrs travel), two different ad sizes (468x60 vs 768x100) and have much different traffic patterns (members who stay vs visitors who come for info).

From what I can tell, an informational site, one that is well linked and not too sticky will do the best in terms of revenue.

The case study of airline seats says this as well. People don't sit on the site all day, discussing seats, they come, get a bit of info and leave.

That is why Google results adwords do the best. People are looking for information.

BZ