Forum Moderators: martinibuster
If visitors have firewall installed in their machines, AdSense will not work.
Depends on the firewall, whether it has an ad blocker, and whether the ad blocker is turned on by default (as is the case with Norton Internet Security unless I'm mistaken).
I doubt if this is a big problem yet, and I imagine Google will find an alternative way to deliver ads if such blocking becomes widespread.
I doubt if this is a big problem yet
Conjecture? Or do you have something to back it up?
I am seeing Norton on an awful lot of machines. Starts with the "free" 30 day subscription to Norton AV on many new XP machines, which then gets the big advertising push when it comes time to renew.
Also, in my day job the network admins have installed something that is blocking most ads, although I think it is some form of script blocking from what I can tell. (They're a secretive lot over in that department.)
I suspect it is getting pretty widespread.
WBF
edited-gave name of wrong forum.
[edited by: Powdork at 5:30 am (utc) on May 13, 2004]
This may become a problem, but again, I doubt very much if it's a problem in most advertising categories right now (although it might be in categories where the typical prospect is a power user).
Now blocking a large % of ads is indeed possible... so once they can selectivly block ads on a per-user basis (on the corporate network) then it may persist. Data processors and the like don't need to see ads... but then do they really need the Internet on their desktop?
Systems come loaded with Norton AV, which is not a problem. 30 days later, when it is time to re-up the subscription for virus definitions there is a nice push to get one to upgrade to NIS. You know, no more annoying pop-ups, spam filtering, etc.
That is when NIS gets installed.
Anyone seen any stats on haow many copies of NIS are installed out there?
WBF
But I do think Google should contact with Norton regarding this and I think maybe Google has alread done it because by disabling AdSense, Norton brings loss *both* to publishers and advertisers.
Any idea?
As a user of NIS, I can tell you the original installation goes further, it blocks the full AdWords set, including all adverts on the Google search results pages.
So Google themselves have a pretty big problem, when you consider how much of their revenue comes from this source.
So Google themselves have a pretty big problem
If that's true then it's almost 100% certain Google are working on something :)
When calculating Google's value I can't see analysts missing this as one of the minus points ... unless Google convinces them it's got something up it's sleeve to combat ad blocking. There's also, of course, substantial revenue at stake that should serve as a motivator to action.
Unless Google's done a deal with Symantec......;)
Any Googleguy/AWA care to comment?
I set up a script that monitored this header (as well as doing a spyware check) and the results wern't good. Out of 62330 machines tested 6.65% had Norton, or something that alters the HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING header in the same way, installed
The only reason I can see to modify that header would be to make it easier to process the page before the user sees it.
Oh, and 34.79% had at least one piece of easily detectable spyware installed :(
But some website, say, about.com seems auto-detect if you have NIS (or similar) installed. If yes, AdSense will not display hence the visitor will not get a un-clickable area.
That's probably a bug, not a feature. About.com doesn't display any ads, period, on my PC (which has Norton Internet Security installed with ad blocking turned off). Some of the pages are a mess, maybe because of CSS problems.
As others have said, Google is obviously aware of the problem with NIS's default ad blocking, and a solution is bound to come along in due course if only because Google doesn't enjoy losing revenue any more than we do.
[webmasterworld.com...]
Of course, I would be happy to host the page and everyone can redirect them to it.;)