Forum Moderators: martinibuster
The key is if there is an advertiser that matches your "info content".
No advertiser, no earnings, simply as that.
Adsense probably wouldn't work for everyone, as not all topics have advertisers that pay money for that theme.
But back to the topic of the post...the new PSA ads are supposedly designed to better differentiate between a paid ad and a PSA, hopefully to increase clickthrus on actual paid ads.
It should be interesting to see if this effect actually happens.
Who does google pay to make these things?
My assumption is that Google does not charge charities for the traffic; so clicking on the PSA would not harm the charity in anyway. Reading the message, learning about their services, and possibly supporting their cause sounds like a good thing to me.
Likewise, I understand, I don't get any ill gotten pennies for clicking on PSAs, while Google gets all sorts of kudos from the non-profit world.
I agree that Google should punish people clicking on their own ads. Does the same apply for PSAs? There have been several showing up on my site that I find intriguing.
I agree.
Usually, I like the idea of PSA's. I believe they reflect positively on my website. So, I don't like replacing them with something else.
But I have mine in skyscraper format and the new ones are really ugly, with the un-smooth large bold font and the chopped up urls. The Just for Dads ad turns into the "www.marchofdi"
(rest of the url on the second line).
Not nice.
I'm perturbed, especially as most of my pages only get PSA's right now.
Now google has changed the ads I have disabled them, they are ugly intrusive and just plain nasty!
My sentiments exactly.
Setting up alternative ads is on my agenda for the first part of the week.
Too bad to, I actually liked having a few PSAs occasionally. I thought it was good public relations for the site.
But enough of my visitors sponsor charitable events that I might just load those event announcements as alts.