Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I've set up a spreadsheet that uses the following facts and assumptions:
- My site's monthly traffic
- A range of click-through rates that I judge to be reasonable for my site
- A range of PPC ad prices that appear to be reasonable for the keywords of my site (according to [uv.bidtool.overture.com...]
Now all I need is a range of reasonable assumptions about what percentage Google might pay. Based on other threads in this forum, I'm thinking of using numbers between about 25% and 50%.
So here's my question for you all -- based on your experience with AdSense, would I be wise to consider the possibility of getting less than 25% commission? Should I consider the possibility of getting more than 50% commission?
I know there's no way to be precise! (And that trying to be precise would violate TOS.) I'm asking a very general question -- what's your intuitive feel for a range of numbers that would, in your opinion, be most likely to yield useful -- not accurate, just useful! -- results.
Does 25% to 50% sound like a sensible range of possible commission rates? Or should I skew that range higher? Lower?
Thanks very much! I value your intuitive feel for the issue!
Charlie
The time it takes to put the adsense code up and give it a test run for a few weeks is probably less than the time it takes to figure out spreadsheets and possible percentages.
Seems like it would be worth just trying it out.
There are issues I didn't go into that make this little "what-if" scenario I'd like to run a very wise investment of my time and effort. Trust me on that...
So, what does anyone think of 25% to 50%? Is that a reasonable range to look at, or does your gut tell you it should be tweaked on way or the other?
Charlie
[edited by: valley at 10:26 pm (utc) on April 9, 2004]
But it's hard to guesstimate your clickthrough rate, you don't know what kind of ads will actually be targeted to your site, and the Overture tool isn't necessarily a good guide to what Google advertisers pay. IMO if you're careful you could estimate your earnings to within about a factor of two at best.
If you have a dynamic site it wouldn't take that long to set up.
With regard to % it would depend on the content of your site.
I'd be ecstatic to forecast with an accuracy of plus or minus 100%, given all the imponderable variables everyone points out. I'll be happy if I come out within the right order of magnitude, i.e. tens of dollars versus hundreds of dollars versus thousands of dollars.
Given the extreme variability of real-world scenarios, I think that very rough level of forecasting is all that's realistic. For my purposes, it's still useful.
Charlie
But this is just the kind of insight I wanted to be armed with before I tried it.
I'll be interested to see if anyone else suggests any other ballparks wildly different from the 25% to 50% that many people seem comfortable with.
Charlie
You don't have the true adwords rates.
You don't know what percentage of the CPC the publisher gets {the best guess is tiered}
You do not know if the term that is going to be trigered is the one you think of. It could be a similar one with a different CPC.
I think that even when one thinks that he knows what one is getting along comes something like channels and throws light into what sections of your website are making money and which sections are payng out the minimum.
Put the code up, chances are you will make better or as good a return as anything else out there.