Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Channel Data "No Data"

First real day with Channel data and all i get is "No Data Available"

         

ChrisKud5

1:29 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So today is the first real day i have channel tracking going for my site. I went through 500 pages of one site last night and catergorized by a useful determinate to seperate site into various "channels"/

I have many impressions, many clicks, and earnings for today, however when i sort by channel data, all i ever get is "no data available". Obviously the clicks and impressions are on SOME of the pages, and all of the pages are in a channel, so why am i getting "no data available"?

Does anyones channel data actually show anything?

matthew288

1:48 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



On the reports page it states "Please note that channel report data is delayed 2 days."

dongjp

1:53 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



From the FAQ it says the Channel data stats will be produced 2 days later than aggregate stats. So you might only see No Data within 48 hours.

ChrisKud5

6:30 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I guess I totally missed that part

thanks!

paybacksa

7:52 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Just for fun, I wish Google would post an announcement that poor grammer on web pages would start decreasing PR, effective in 48 hours.

Based on the way we all google_ad_channel codes last night, I fugure we would eliminate 50% of poor grammer worldwide in about 6 hours!

(and the world would be a better place ;-)

varya

8:02 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



And while they're at it, I suppose they could tackle the use of poor grammar (and spelling).

ChrisKud5

9:37 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



grammer and spelling are both matters of personal perception. I don't like a single book with words in telling me how to live life

loanuniverse

9:40 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



....poor grammar (and spelling)

:D

danny

10:45 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hmmm. Grammer [dictionary.reference.com] appears to be a town in Indiana... not sure why it's so popular here, do a lot of WebmasterWorld users come from there?

As for grammar, I'm not a prescriptivist, but some things are still jarring enough (to most native speakers) that "wrong" makes perfect sense - and you certainly want to avoid doing them on your web sites.

Jon_King

10:56 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well put, Danny.

ChrisKud5

12:33 am on Mar 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I optimize my site for mispellings.

In one instance, I get more traffic for a one word name phrase that is spelled wrong than i do from the same word spelled correctly. The funny thing is both are at the same #1 position in the serps.

Spelling correctly = less traffic

Spelling incorrectly = more traffic = more adsense $$

Dan_Norder

12:34 am on Mar 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Grammer is the British spelling. It's like taking potshots at the spelling of "colour" or "aluminium."

And, no, I'm not British, just been on enough international boards to cath on after a while.

chrisk999

12:43 am on Mar 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How is 'grammer' the British spelling of 'grammar'?!