Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.234.244.30

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

300x250 Low Earners

     
2:21 am on Jun 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:May 19, 2005
posts:362
votes: 0


I've recently been trying out some 300x250 Image Only ad units (looking for videos), and I gotta say- the return is very low.
There are many .05 clicks on these things as images.

The targeting is spot on, and there are some really great looking ads!
Wish I knew why the bottom line is so low.
CPM?

10:08 am on June 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:June 5, 2006
posts:43
votes: 0


In contrary, I have experienced that 300x250 ads give me good eCPM compare with other formats. This happened after I relocated the ads.

I think the position of your ads also contribute to the value you earn.

I have read that ads display near top of page has more $ value compare with one near the bottom.

10:27 am on June 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 25, 2005
posts:1019
votes: 0


Heartlander wrote:
300x250 Image Only ad units (looking for videos)

Change it to text and image.

There probably aren't that many video ads at the moment. If you have image only, the level of competition will be very low and you'll be virtually giving the space away. By allowing text, your video providers will have to increase their bids to get them seen, and if they've invested in video then they will probably be prepared to increase their bids.

11:54 am on June 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 20, 2005
posts:224
votes: 0


just for some research, could you pm me your url. I want to varify your ad location and compare with few others I have
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members