Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Flooding your pages with Ads

will earn you less

         

Chris999

1:48 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




I used to put the maximum number of Ads allowed on all my pages. 3 Ads 2 link units. This can increase your CTR but dont do this!

The adverts on your first Ad block nearly always pay much higher. Possibly up to x10.

For example on my first leaderboard the ads earn around .50 per click, the next Ad only earns around .05 per click.

Don't give them the option of clicking cheap Ads. I would say changing my sites to only display 1 leaderboard Ad gave me a 25% increase in earning even with the lower CTR.

I imagine some of you wont agree with this...bring on the comments.

G_Smitty

2:06 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes most would agree with you. See the current thread.

[webmasterworld.com ]

StuntasticAudi

2:18 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



less ads = more money

OptiRex

3:03 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)



3 Ads 2 link units

Do you mean 2 x Adlink units?

Not permitted unless the rules have been changed. Anyway, you've learnt the same lesson most of us have...

Me?

1 x Leaderboard
1 x Adlink

europeforvisitors

3:16 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)



Plus, if you make your pages look like the "resident" direct-mail garbage that arrives in my mailbox, you won't get repeat traffic and only the most clueless users will click on ads.

milanmk

3:20 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Fully agree. My CTR/CPM have shown around 50% increase by reducing one ad unit and one link unit per page.

jema

3:22 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



May be something in this, I notice my most clicked ads get 5x the clicks but return only twice the money. I think I will drop some leaderboards and see if this changes.

crick

3:26 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is that one leaderboard across bottom or the top? A lot of people suggest having leaderboards or large rectangle at the end of an article but some say it is better to have it at the top. The ones at the top makes the site look pretty spammy though, A lot of people do not like being hit with ads as soon as they eter a site.

jema

3:34 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It is a leaderboard at the top I have removed experimentally on pages where there is a prominant ad block where the user will have their eyes drawn to it.
So hopefully less ad space, better payment.

jema

5:33 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hmm 3 hours since I did this, and already the early results look incredibly positive :) Can't wait for the days total, obviously the remaining advert is up and the removed channels down, so I cannot yet be assolutely sure.

21_blue

5:51 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



jema, be prepared for your initial good results to temper. You may have a good smartprice at the moment, and getting extra clicks on a page with a good price will produce nice earnings for that day. However, if the higher CTR means lower conversions, when the smartprice for that page or the site is updated, the EPC may drop. You therefore need to look at longer term earnings to assess the impact of the new ad placements.

Paris

6:38 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One or two ad blocks, one adlink and usually no search box, is the mix that I have had the best success with.

Going from 1 to 3 ads isn't so much the problem as the placement of those ads. Always make sure that the first AdSense ad block listed in the HTML is the one in the hottest hot spot on your site. Otherwise, it's simply just a matter of subtraction by addition.

Naturally fewer ads are more appealing too.

annej

9:06 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hmm, I'm begininning to wonder now if that might be my problem. I just put an additional 2 ad banner at the end of my long articles. But they are first on the page as I've used CSS to put the side column (with the wide skyscraper ad) at the end of the HTML. If I am understanding you right I may be getting the higher paying ads at the end of the page where my click through rate is lower. Yikes! I need to do something about that.

BillDex

9:21 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think of putting 1 125x125 button ad somewhere in the middle of my website next to the paragraph and 1 or 2 120x90 Horizontal link units somewhere at the bottom, again next to the paragraph b/c if you put them right next [left, bottom or right] to the topic, the robot displays the MOST relevant ads. I also make the ads not-so-flashy, the link to the advertiser is Blue, the background is white [merges with my website] and the advertiser's URL is black.

Scurramunga

9:51 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Since reducing the amount of blocks on my page I have noticed dramatic improvements. Above all I never place ads below the fold line now.

21_blue

11:13 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



annej wrote:
If I am understanding you right I may be getting the higher paying ads at the end of the page where my click through rate is lower. Yikes! I need to do something about that.

My understanding is that the higher paying ads are in the block that is loaded first. Also, if you place the ad above the fold, you'll get a better EPC.

On the other hand, ads at the bottom of the page might convert better, thereby increasing smartprice. My feeling is that it has to be decided on a page-by-page basis by analysing the performance of each ad placement (using custom channels). I've been intending for a while to do some proper statistical analysis on this but have been busy doing other things.

jema

8:57 am on Mar 31, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My days results were actually on the poor side following this change. Though not outside of the range of normal deviation. So I am left confused.
Will leave this change in for today though and see what happens.

acme2005

9:32 am on Mar 31, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"The adverts on your first Ad block nearly always pay much higher. Possibly up to x10."

I don't think.
How can you say?

larryhatch

10:12 am on Mar 31, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If sites ranking above mine in the SERPs flood their pages with ads I don't complain.
I wish the cruddier ones would all do that. -Larry

blueheaven123

9:43 am on Apr 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I tried this, and am getting the same earnings.
Clickable rate is down(position hasnt changed), though the ecpm is a little higher.

But I think this will be better for my visitors, as I'm sure many got put away with having 3 rectangle blocks on every page.

21_blue

12:26 pm on Apr 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Blueheaven wrote:
I tried this, and am getting the same earnings

Hey, blue, are we related?

Are you doing this across all pages? When I've done it before on all pages, my total earnings dropped.

But now, I'm giving it a try only on the pages that yield a consistently low EPC by comparison with the rates for that topic in Adwords. I reckon it'll take 2 or 3 weeks to feed through the smartpricing loop, so I don't know what the impact is yet.

blueheaven123

4:44 pm on Apr 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Sadly it would take a long time to do them for individual pages, because there are over 2000 of them.

bumpski

2:01 pm on Apr 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



One thing contrary to this, Google search results!

Google shows up to 99? Ads per results page. Search a heavily advertised topic using &num=99 appended to your search string. As an Adwords advertiser I tend to check how many ads show in Google's results to see the number of competitive ads. Of course now with seperate pricing its hard to tell what's happening on the "content" network (mostly us).

What does Google know? They do show 8 ads per 10 result page. They are consistent in their formatting just a simple right column that is always the same format. Even they would do better if they put their ads column to the left and I'm sure they know it!

You would think Google would only display 4 or 5 ads per page if it paid better overall. Of course they do have a lot of ads inventory to show!

I imagine a problem with a lot of ads is when they are scattered all over the page making it difficult to find the content. I could see if you use a large rectangle, you probably shouldn't use more than one! But one could say Google proves that multiple skyscrapers consistently integrated may be OK.

21_blue

2:40 pm on Apr 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



blueheaven123 wrote:
it would take a long time

I have a similar problem, but have applied the pareto rule: I'm only focusing on the pages that are relatively high volume and low EPC. I'll report back in a couple of weeks on the impact, if any.

Kimkia

4:51 am on Apr 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This is an interesting thread.

I do very well with AdSense on my main site, but am always looking for better ways to do everything. This may be one of them, so I'll be sure to check back to see how y'all are doing!

david_uk

9:46 am on Apr 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Multiple blocks on a page was a disaster for me. I now have one ad above the fold, and that works great.

Also, I've never subscribed to the idea of ads on all pages. I don't think showing ads are appropriate on many of my pages, and if ads don't work on pages that are well visited I remove them. This is where Google should let us choose to show cpm or cpc ads - we know where ads work on our sites rather better than they ever will, so we are logically the ones that should decide. The other issue of course is that of ad-blindness. I save the ads for pages they work on in order to reduce ad blindness on my site.

Out of interest, this topic has been discussed quite a few times in the past, and the general feeling is that less is most certainly more!

Fuzzyfish1000

9:58 am on Apr 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've dropped a single 125x125 off my left margin for a particular channel on my site, after reading this thread (this morning). There is now a single link ad, and a single 468x60, embedded in the content. It's a very content-heavy page.

Oddly, the 125 square ad was getting the least number of clicks before, but the highest value (by a long way). My earnings seem a little down so far today, but I guess it would take a while before seeing any results. Any ideas how long I should leave it? Obviously, I don't want to leave it running long term if it doesn't yield results, but it would be annoying to run it 5 days, and change back if it required 6 days before Google updated the pricing.

annej

4:18 am on Apr 4, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm not so sure CTR is used for smart pricing.

I do agree the top ads are the highest paying. But if you have really long pages like many article pages I can't see how it would hurt to have ads at the bottom. The people who are going to click right away will only see the top ads but people who make it to the bottom of the page are more likely to click the bottom ad. Since more people just skim the top section more would click the ad above the fold but why not have something at the bottom for the few who would click there? If CTR isn't a part of smart pricing that should just be a little added earnings.

danimal

5:04 am on Apr 4, 2006 (gmt 0)



yup, google really stacks up the ads in the search results, good point.

the key to multiple ad blocks is to make sure that they don't repeat advertisers on the same page, and that there aren't any mfa's in there... just like google does it.

if your sector can't handle that, perhaps because of a lack of quality advertisers, then you'll have to cut back on the ad blocks.

quality advertising that is properly targeted in a conservative manner, will not scare off your traffic... compelling content is what brings 'em back.

21_blue

6:28 am on Apr 4, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



FuzzyFish wrote:
Any ideas how long I should leave it?

The site-wide element of smartpricing seems to update at least weekly (possibly twice a week). See [webmasterworld.com...] to work out when it updates on your account.

I've not had much success previously with removing channels, but this time I've concentrated on pages with low EPC relative to adwords rates and things are going well. I'm not sure, therefore, if removing a high EPC ad is a good idea. Could you tell us what results you get after a week or two?

This 41 message thread spans 2 pages: 41