Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I clicked on it to take a look. - Its a page consisting entirely of Google and other ads all carefully blended in together, very professional but (IMHO) solidly against the Google TOS.
So intrigued, I looked at the URL more closely, It was a dotcom followed by /kw/my_search_phrase.
So I removed my_search_phrase and substituted another. Sure enough, another page of Ads, all targeted quite nicely to my new phrase.
I would love to hear opinion on this before I mention it to Google (It might be your site ;-)
I have seen other sites similar. It contains a copy of search results from google.
How do I found it. I searched for the incomings links for my site...and saw there, a google results on one of his page pointing to my site.
So intrigued, I looked at the URL more closely, It was a dotcom followed by /kw/my_search_phrase.
I did a search on Google and I found many websites doing exactly the same thing you explained. Google Adsense is infested with cheaters and there is nothing anybody can do about it. It's sad, very sad.
If such sites are not your cup of tea, like somebody said, move back and go ahead with your work. Why ruin that website owners life. After all, if he ever makes money, then it is because the site visitors thought his 'links' were useful enough.It is not for us to say if the visitors thought that the site was a bad idea.
In fact, visitors could even be better quality overall since they were specifically looking to buy large blue widgets and found them on your large_blue_widgets.htm page instead of finding them on someone else's small-green-widgets website.
Root
/about
/events
44 pages
-
-default.asp?Pr=10
-default.asp?Pr=110
-default.asp?Pr=111
-default.asp?Pr=137
-default.asp?Pr=151
-default.asp?Pr=155
-default.asp?Pr=155p2
-default.asp?Pr=156
-default.asp?Pr=187
-default.asp?Pr=188
-default.asp?Pr=189
-default.asp?Pr=2
-default.asp?Pr=206
-default.asp?Pr=210
-default.asp?Pr=240
-default.asp?Pr=244
-default.asp?Pr=250
-default.asp?Pr=258
-default.asp?Pr=286
-default.asp?Pr=287
-default.asp?Pr=316
-default.asp?Pr=347
-default.asp?Pr=35
-default.asp?Pr=350
-default.asp?Pr=36
-default.asp?Pr=364
-default.asp?Pr=405
-default.asp?Pr=425
-default.asp?Pr=453
-default.asp?Pr=46
-default.asp?Pr=48
-default.asp?Pr=50
-default.asp?Pr=52
-default.asp?Pr=62
-default.asp?Pr=7
-default.asp?Pr=7p2
-default.asp?Pr=8
-default.asp?Pr=9
-default.asp?Pr=97
-default.asp?Pr=97p2
-default.asp?Pr=97p3
-default.asp?Pr=97p4
-new-listings.asp
It's not a general thread about MFAs. There are several ongoing threads on that topic if you want to make general comments about MFAs.
The topic of this thread is comments on a specific circumstance, not general commentary about unrelated websites. Three or four duplicate ongoing anti-mfa threads is repetitive and redundant, so let's keep the discussion going where it belongs.
Thanks for understanding.