Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Incidentally, would anyone else have a use for a 3-banner 600x75 space?
with 4 ads he subliminally can not decide and just regards it as advertising?
what do you think? I am not a psychologists, just tried to change it and compare the stats
you might also argue that 4 banners get ignored as they are perceived as "just advertising" and 2 banenrs might look interesting and there is a "which one do i prefer of those 2" question and the user clicks on the one he likes most.
with 4 ads he subliminally can not decide and just regards it as advertising?what do you think?
I thought my initial response would have already addressed this. After all, it was based on many comments posted here over the past few months. Not a single person has reported a lower CTR when switching from a 2 ad banner to the 4 ad format.
You can try to rationalize psychological behavior all you want. I don't think that will change the reality.
Well, for my site, 468x60 works better simply because it blends in with the rest of text more easily due to its size. Whereas a 120x600 will be still somewhat 'identifiable'
Aesthetics and CTR are totally different though and this topic is about which format brings a higher CTR.
Most webmasters will forego the ideal look if it means more revenue. Obviously you seem to feel different about that, but I don't think that changes the results given.
I use 468x60 banners on my site, but put Google into a 120x600 space since it makes the most sense for my purposes. However, the 120x600 space is only on *really* long content page (maybe 35-40% of all page views).
For those pages without the 120x600 space, I'd love to be able to use the industry standard 600x75 size (the max horizontal size my site can use), which I figure ought to be able to hold three horizontal ads in a good font size.
If Google's looking to add a fourth size option, I think a 3-ad 600x75 would be ideal. The huge squarish size is much harder to place and really doesn't fit anywhere for me.