I felt less silly when someone raised the same question a couple of weeks ago, and now that annej has come out as a hermit I now feel we've established some kind of "wired but completely-out-of-it" club).
True enough. Just as long as there remains some kind of obvious separation between the paid-for listings and the general, I'm happy - I'm uncomfortable with what I perceive to be an assumption, in some quarters (various net commentaries), that all business or non-not-for-profit sites have money coming out of their ears, especially at startup. I'd like to see the possibility of hard work and a dose of good luck alone, rather than deep pockets alone, allowing smaller organisations/startups/one-man-band operations some success. Yeah okay, I'm in idealist mode. I just do a lot of work for smaller operations that usually will not carry the additional cost until they have first seen some favourable results. Chicken & egg..
wired but completely-out-of-it
I guess I have just been focusing on what I wanted to see as I do check keywords and search for info a lot. Tunnel Vision.
Also I posted this in Google News as I was looking at it from the point of view of someone who can't afford to buy keywords. I wish they had left it there as it was with that point of view that I was writing. Of course people who buy sponsered links will see it differently.
I just think of those SEs that have a list of 10 or 12 paid links above any results. It really gives the impression they are just another ad source. If Google wants to primarily be a way for people to find information on the web and not just comercial sites they need to think about this. I didn't mind the paid ads on the side and thought that was the balanced way to go.
Anne