Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Volume of Google Ads versus Overture Ads

         

konaandcooper

2:49 am on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have been in the world of PPC for many years, and one thing still causes me to scratch my head and ask "why?"

Go to Overture and type in a random term such as "mortgage" and you will get 100 different people willing to pay for that keyword. Then go to Google type in the same word and it is not uncommon to see a third to a half of the same number of people willing to pay. Where are the other 50 or 60 advertisers? Why are they not advertising on Google as well?

I typically find that there is far less competition on Google, but almost even more important is the fact that the minimum bid to be in first place on Google is Always cheaper than the minimum bid required for a similiar position on Overture?

So I guess my question to all the my fellow PPC veterans is " why aren't these advertisers advertising on Google as well as Overture?

Anyone...Bueller....Anyone?

jim2003

12:42 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello,

This it total speculation, but it that many more people bid on google, but thier ads have been disabled because of low CTR. On overture if the human reviews find an ad relevent it stays up until the advertiser doesn't want it anymore. On google it disappears if the CTR is too low.

Not sure what the other reasons might be.

Regards

keywordguru

1:48 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree with Jim.
Either the works get disabled due to low CTR, or there is just not that big of a market.
What I have noticed with Overture is, if you want to pay for it, you can have it! With Google, this will only hold for so long.

I have had some Overture keywords that have well over 10 bidders, up in the $10 per click range and those words have never received more than one or two clicks in months. So competition does not always show popularity.

If you want to really find out the truth, set up a mini campaign for each network and track the clickrates yourself with an independent tracker. Start with a mid to high ranged bid price and you will soon see if the word is successful. I usually only need to spend a few dollars to know if it will be profitable or not.
KG

konaandcooper

1:55 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I respectfully doubt the speculation. One reason why I doubt it is because to maintain a .5% minimum CTR on Google usually means simply having a relevent ad and showing up on the first two pages (top 16 positions). Quite often I will see 20 ads on Overture for a keyword and maybe only 4 or five on Google for the same keyword. Does anybody think it might have something to do with the fact that Google does not let advertisers start a program unless they have a credit card as opposed to issuing a check or wiring the cash in? I know some people are uneasy about using their credit card online, some people may not want to declare income from online ventures. If smaller advertisers were to use their credit card they might not be able tohide behind the anonymity of wiring cash or sending in a money order which doesn't require ID.

Jack_Hughes

3:36 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I suspect that demographics of the SE users comes into play somewhat.

My non-technical siblings don't use google at all. they all use yahoo & msn for their searches.

I, and every techie I know, uses google.

My suspicion is that for non-technical searches (like mortgages) the competition is going to be hotter on yahoo/msn than google and for technical searches the reverse will be true. It certainly is in my (technical) area of expertise.

AdWordsAdvisor

9:34 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Go to Overture and type in a random term such as "mortgage" and you will get 100 different people willing to pay for that keyword. Then go to Google type in the same word and it is not uncommon to see a third to a half of the same number of people willing to pay.

One thought that occurs to me, and it is certainly related to jim2003's point earlier:

If I take the example quoted above literally, I'd say it is quite possible that many advertisers on AdWords have learned from experience that very general keywords such as 'mortgage' don't deliver very qualified customers, and may become disabled as well.

I'd like to think that AdWords advertisers are using really targeted keywords like 'mortgage broker sf ca' instead.

Another possibility is that on Overture, ads are delivered full speed ahead until the funding has been used up - whereas, on AdWords, ads will be started and stopped over the course of the 24 hour day to align with the daily budget set by the advertiser.

Just a couple of thoughts. ;)

AWA

rbarker

8:23 am on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>My suspicion is that for non-technical searches (like mortgages) the competition is going to be hotter on yahoo/msn than google and for technical searches the reverse will be true. It certainly is in my (technical) area of expertise.


Spot-On Jack_Hughes. There was a time when Alta Vista was the SE of choice for techies so placement at AV was a must if you were selling a technical widget/service. Different SE's "tend" to generate different demographics. This is a point often over-looked when comparing traffic flows from one SE verses another.

eWhisper

10:44 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think there is one other very simple solution to this.

Overture was first.

I've talked to a lot of people who say they advertise on Overture, but when asked why they don't use Google, the responses are usually:

1. Google has a PPC program?
2. We're spending our net budget, why should we expand?
3. Google is too complicated.

When Overture came out, a lot of smaller businesses jumped at it as they were looking for more exposure, and they just haven't had the same urge to go back and find more exposure as they figure 'they're already on the net'.

WebStart

4:18 am on Sep 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Re > 3. Google is too complicated. <

I suspect that has a lot to do with it, because Google is complicated. You never know exactly, ahead of time, exactly what position you are going hold on their list of ads and for what price. And you don't know what price you will have to pay and what daily budget you will have to agree to, to stay at whatever level you want to be at. It is a very dynamic system. And requires, probably, a mind like that of those who originated it, to fully understand it. Overture is simpler by a factor of 10.

RedWolf

6:17 pm on Sep 13, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would agree with the more complicated assesment. It does take more effort to set up and get good results from Google, but for me the results are much better. I spend about 8 to 10 times as much on any given day on Google as I do Overture at the same CPC range and get much better conversions from Google. I started with Overture way back, but moved most of my efforts to Google last fall after taking the time to optimize my campaigns.

I also am not sure about the whole Google users are more technical argument either since Google powers a lot of the ISP searches and most of all AOL! I get a large chunk of my better conversions from AOL.

fenway

7:37 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



following on from AWA, I think this does have a lot to do with how often ads get served, based on daily caps. Sometimes it only looks like 2 or 3 others are bidding on a keyword on a given search, but if you sit there and hit refresh a bunch of times, throughout the day, week, month, you'll often eventually see your other competitors ads that you typically compete with in Overture.