Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Adwords WAY Overpriced

         

bostonseo

2:33 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



Google Adwords is so overpriced compared to Overture. What's running up the prices is Mom and Pop shops coming in and spending $1,000 and leaving and next week it's more of the same. The quality of clicks seem to be serious declining as well. Is anyone else seeing the same thing?

I'm boycotting Google Adwords; who is joining me?

MarkHutch

2:36 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Unlike you, we find them very effective and affordable.

bostonseo

2:36 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



To lend some factual support; on the same terms I advertise on both Google and Overture...Google is more consistently more than 2x as expensive.

For example I have a very highly searched term on Overture and many competitors bidding on it that at the #1 position is $2.25 per click. On Google that term is consistently $5.00+ and only getting worse.

Basically this way on all the terms.

bostonseo

2:36 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



Just out of curiousity what industry are you bidding in and how are the prices on Google compared to Overture.

blaze

2:37 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just lower your bid, dude.

bakedjake

2:38 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



On some of our terms, it's 4x to 5x as expensive.

It's still profitable for us and our clients. Who cares how much it costs as long as you're making money?

bostonseo

2:41 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



Yeah but don't you see that prices go up way faster than your revenue per sale will right? So at some point it won't be profitable. Am I right? Look at how dramatically the prices are rising; what other products/services or forms of advertising increase like this?

bakedjake

2:42 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



But if you're making money, why would you do something that will cause you to make less money?

Your boycott doesn't make sense.

bostonseo

2:45 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



Because I can spend these Marketing dollars elsewhere more profitably. Does that not occur to you? Wow I'm glad you don't manage my budget.

bakedjake

2:50 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Then take your money somewhere else! I recognize that in some industries, PPC may not be the best avenue. That's not a boycott, that's a good business decision.

Look at how dramatically the prices are rising

As one of the posters said above, lower your bid. You do not always have to be first, especially on Google. Have you experimented with different bids/positions?

what other products/services or forms of advertising increase like this?

Commercials during The World Series of Poker was one that came to mind immediately.

Yeah but don't you see that prices go up way faster than your revenue per sale will right?

Yeah, I mean, eventually it could happen. But it simply isn't right now. We go through waves, and after a while, the stupid bidders lose all their money and realize it isn't working for them.

bostonseo

3:00 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



I worry for your clients because your logic is so tragically flawed.

Love you reference about the World Series of Poker though; what a great analogy. Where do I sign up with you? (sarcasm)

blaze

3:03 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What exactly is your logic?

I commonly lower my bids when the price gets too high

Actually, I just leave my bids alone, for that matter.

This is a free market. Perhaps people are bidding higher because they can convert better.

[edited by: blaze at 3:04 am (utc) on July 14, 2004]

FromRocky

3:03 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Note that Google and Overture didn't set the price for #1 positions but You and I did. A higher price on Google only means that advertising on AdWords is more effective than on Overture's.

I hope there is a second AdWords somewhere.

bakedjake

3:04 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I worry for your clients because your logic is so tragically flawed.

I don't know what's so flawed about "I'm making money, I continue to engage in those activities which are profitable for me.", but I'm sorry it sounds flawed to you.

jimbeetle

3:36 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



For example I have a very highly searched term on Overture and many competitors bidding on it that at the #1 position is $2.25 per click. On Google that term is consistently $5.00+ and only getting worse.

It isn't that Google is overpriced, it's that your competitors are driving up the bid.

Why?

Well, folks who use PPC are usually very familiar with both Google Adwords and Overture.

Your competitors have apparently decided that, in your market, a $5.00+ bid on Adwords can be just as effective as a $2.25 bid on Overture.

Are they more effective at selling? Higher conversions? Does a$5+ a bid still make for a good ROI? Check them out. What might they be doing that you aren't?

Do what Blaze says. Drop your bid to where you can get a reasonable ROI. Then tweak your ads, check your sell pages. Work it.

digitalv

3:51 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



AdWords itself isn't "overpriced" - AdWords itself is what, 5 cents. It's the people you're bidding against that drive the price up on any given keyword.

It all depends on what you're selling and how much your competitors are willing to spend. Some of my keywords are as much as $11 - $14 per click to be in the number one spot, which I'll gladly pay. It might seem high, but keep in mind I'm selling $2,500 - $9,000 items.

My ads are also very targeted and all have the word "BUY" in them - the conversion ratio is much higher when people know that they're going to have to spend money to get whatever you're offering before they click the ad. For me it only makes sense to be in the number one position. If that's not the case with you try lowering your Cost per click and see if you do better. Sure you'll get less clicks but you'll probably get a higher return on investment.

bostonseo

4:12 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



You are ALL wrong here. It's the same number of competitors on both Overture and Google but because of the lack of control per placement on Google prices are dramatically higher. If Google allowed you to actually be #1 based on Max bid then the price war wouldn't exist as it does.

You never know what you are going to pay for a click on Google and that creates this mess.

Anyone who doesn't see this just doesn't get it. And does not understand the business side of this medium.

My whole point of this thread was just to document that Google prices are much higher than Overture and for that reason Overture is a better investment profitability-wise.

Do you all work for Google? What's with the defensiveness when all my comments are based on fact; not a personal vendetta with Google.

skibum

4:13 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



We can't blame Google or Overture or even competitors for how much we spend for a click. We decide how much we want to pay.

Lowering bids can work wonders.

With careful keyword selection you can take the number one AdWords spot in competitive markets while working on affiliate commissions. Out-bid the merchant and all the competitors in that space and still make money.

Naturally in an open marketplace like AdWords, the margins will tend to go to zero as competition increases. The battle is won through keyword selection and increasing conversion rates.

blaze

4:21 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, actually, I'm on your side. I agree, we should all boycott high bids which don't lead to profit and ROI.

I hope that Call To Action isn't too far out of line for the TOS on this website.

ogletree

4:25 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I think the biggest problem with G is that broad match will beat exact match. It allows people to bid $5 on all terms instead of $5 on the big one and $0.50 on the little one. We do great on OV because the four word terms are affordable. It's not right that people keep comeing in every week thinking they can get some good exposure by paying more than they make for advertising. G should make them work and not let them bid on one word with broad match and have the same bid for every possible phrase with that word in it. I agree that AW is set up to make more money and drive up prices. It has nothing to do with G or Y being better. Everybody would like to be on both.

digitalv

4:39 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Do you all work for Google? What's with the defensiveness when all my comments are based on fact; not a personal vendetta with Google.

No, but they do happen to have about 60% of the search engine market and my money is better spent there. In my own experience I've always gotten MUCH better results from AdWords than Overture, not just clicks but overall ROI. The results may be different for you, but in my industry there are more people searching Google for the products I sell than anywhere else. It's worth every penny.

If Overture works better for you then put all of your money in Overture and ignore the other 60% of the web. Meanwhile your competitors will keep advertising in both and pick up all of the customers that you could potentially have recieved from Google.

bostonseo

4:46 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



digitalv Google doesn't have anywhere close to 60% search engine marketshare; it's more like 45% in the latest data.

Sorry to sound like a know-it-all, but in this case actually I do. And this marketshare info is pretty available I can email it to you if you want.

ogletree

4:52 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



G may have 60% when you count all the places it put it's ads. He may also be refering to the percentage they had with organic search back when G used there data. I think you are right there is no way G provides more than 50% of PPC traffic on se's. You can't count the adsense stuff that would be inpossible to figure out.

digitalv

4:52 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Do you all work for Google? What's with the defensiveness when all my comments are based on fact; not a personal vendetta with Google.

No, but they do happen to have about 45% of the search engine market and my money is better spent there. In my own experience I've always gotten MUCH better results from AdWords than Overture, not just clicks but overall ROI. The results may be different for you, but in my industry there are more people searching Google for the products I sell than anywhere else. It's worth every penny.

If Overture works better for you then put all of your money in Overture and ignore the other 45% of the web. Meanwhile your competitors will keep advertising in both and pick up all of the customers that you could potentially have recieved from Google.

BOSTONSEO: Is this better?

bostonseo

4:56 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



Well goodnight all; enjoy your Google Adwords Love-Fest.
Anyone who is getting better profit margins on Adwords versus Overture 'hat's off to you'. I've never seen it done consistently, but I'm not arrogant enough to say it is impossible.

digitalv

5:00 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Been working that way for me for about a year now. I'm spending an average of $12,000 a month on AdWords nearly that on Overture. Both bring in a considerable amount of business but AdWords consistently outperforms Overture by more than 2 to 1.

If I ran my business the way you did, then I should pull out of Overture just because it brings me "less" sales and costs more per conversion. That doesn't make any sense, I still make a killing with both of them.

A better question might be why are you such a "Google-hater"?

bostonseo

5:00 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



digitalv you're picking a one-sided debate with me. Why? I don't know. Kudos to you for getting Adwords to work better for you than Overture. I wish there was a way to set up a poll and have everyone vote. My understanding has been that Overture usually is the preferred ROI program.

limitup

5:03 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



the stupid bidders lose all their money and realize it isn't working for them.

In some markets this is definitely a challenge for established advertisers. New merchants and especially affiliates show up on the scene thinking they are going to get rich quick and bid really high. Sure most of them run out of money in a week or a month when they find out it's not as easy as they thought, but when there is a constant and seemingly neverending supply of these "newbies" it definitely drives prices up across the board, no matter what position you are trying to maintain.

bostonseo

5:04 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



digitalv so how many industries do you manage clients' in?

In response to your question why Google is not my preference, I've never seen it perform more profitably than Overture. This is based on 50+ clients cummulatively spending in excess of $25,000,000.00 in the last year.

blaze

5:06 am on Jul 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just create a post and ask the question - "Which has better ROI, overture or google?" edit- actually, I just did.

Might want to post one in the Overture foruma as well for comparison, though you should mention that you are not repeat posting, just trying to compare..

Anyways, I think you are probably right. However, ROI is only one of many factors when picking a PPC engine.

This 37 message thread spans 2 pages: 37