I can't take any credit though. One of my favorite things to do here is to pass on what I have heard regarding desired features. Many folks here at AdWords are copied on your ideas each week.
And although every requested feature won't be included, please let me assure you that your thoughts are heard and taken seriously.
When one of those requested features makes 'prime time', I'm delighted too.
AWA
PCInk
[webmasterworld.com...]
msg #:7 4:10 am on Oct 29, 2003
"Global negative keyword list"
Typically what we've seen is broad matched keyword with 50 negatives, when one exact match might have done the same thing.
Every negative at ad group level would be validated against every keyword, now it will be at campaign level, I think many people will be cutting too deep into their potential by using them too agressively, we prefer to use tracking tools to actually see what our phrase matched searchers were looking for without any restriction and then add in exact matches or negatives if it's positive or negative results we see, but...... sparingly.
Not unlike excluded keywords in Overture and the great report that I imagine nobody uses, but that's a story for another forum!
Here is the post from AWA which covers it in detail, message 2. [webmasterworld.com...]
And that's just for starters! You don't want people coming to your site, when they have bought a damaged clock from somewhere else - or maybe you do, but you don't want to have to pay for it!
I'm disappointed I get nothing from Google. I'm not sure I can go on....all that time on AdWords! Hey, does anyone else remember when it was pay per impression? I do - and that's when negative keywords were extremely important - you could burn through you budget in seconds if you messed up!
In other words, have you seen significant changes in conversion rates since the new feature went up?