Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google should start charging on a conversion basis.

Feature request for AWA ..

         

transactiongeek

3:34 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)



I'd like to have the choice to pay google like I pay eBay .. sort of Final Value Fees. Part of my bid price can be a flat rate, and the rest I pay is on a conversion basis.

Rather than your bid simply being a MAX CPC, your bid becomes a combination of CPC and how much you pay for a particular kind of conversion.

This way Google can start paying out AdSense according to the conversions they create rather than a bunch of teenagers who get into "click rings".

Also, with this kind of conversion information Google can start placing ads way more intelligently.

Some might argue .. but not everything converts right away.

I disagree with that. I think there are a lot of things which dictate a conversion beyond someone typing in a credit card #. There are the number of clicks, whether they downloaded a demo, joined a newsletter, went into live chat, etc.

BFREE / CJ is already doing it, why can't google? At least we should have the option. For the people who simply can not set themselves up that way, they can pay the old way with a flat bid.

roitracker

3:47 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Also, with this kind of conversion information Google can start placing ads way more intelligently

They'd do a lot more than that with the data!

eWhisper

4:01 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Some people also do not want G to have that information. One of the groups of people that don't use the conversion tracker are those that only want their company to know the conversion rates, spends, etc.

For this system to work, G would have to not only know your conversion rate, but also your sale prices and profit margin. Unless you just mean a higher price if you convert, in which case it seems that companies with few conversions with expensive products would pay less than companies with many conversions but less expensive products.

transactiongeek

4:07 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)



This idea isn't anything new, CJ / BFree are already doing it.

For those who don't want Google to have the info, then they can just do the flat bid as I mentioned and live in the stone age.

BTW, Google actually has everything in place already, they just need to get rid of the silly graphic requirement.

However, instead of saying how much money you make with a conversion, though, you simply enter in how valuable that conversion was to you. Don't need to mess around with profit margins / revenue / etc.

eWhisper

4:10 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



CJ/Bfree are affiliate programs.

AdWords is advertising.

Very different types of visibility.

If G made this a requirement, I know companies who would stop spending money with G.

transactiongeek

4:13 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)



Really? I guess I see BFree/CJ as exactly the same thing as AdSense, except Google has more constraints on where the Ads can go.

I agree with you though, it shouldn't be a requirement at first. ;)

eWhisper

4:37 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hmm, I'm thinking that this would apply to all of AdWords, no matter if the click came from AdSense or Google's main page. I think you have a different version in your head.

I don't consider AdWords to be affiliate like.

AdSense, I'd agree is similiar, but only to a degree.

The problem still remains that for AdSense people to be paid on a conversion basis, I still have to give G my conversion information. At that point, AdSense is no longer advertising - it is an affiliate program.

There are companies that run their affiliate programs inhouse as they don't want a 3rd party knowing their information.

I work with several companies that if they had to give that information to a 3rd party, would discontinue content advertising with AdSense.

I can see the benefit you're talking about as click fraud won't matter - it will be based on the conversion data - but if I want that type of traffic, I'll sign up with CJ.

transactiongeek

4:50 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)



I guess a part of this is just a natural sympathy for the AdSense people.

I feel sad everytime I edit a campaign and turn it off, but what choice do I have?

AdWordsAdvisor

8:02 pm on Feb 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd like to have the choice to pay google like I pay eBay .. sort of Final Value Fees. Part of my bid price can be a flat rate, and the rest I pay is on a conversion basis.

Rather than your bid simply being a MAX CPC, your bid becomes a combination of CPC and how much you pay for a particular kind of conversion...

Clearly some pros and cons with this idea, based on the discussion in this thread, but I'll certainly pass it on to the right folks.

AWA

transactiongeek

4:27 pm on Feb 11, 2004 (gmt 0)



We're discussing this in the AdSense forum, but it occurs to me that some competitor could take out your AdSense account by simply clicking on your AdSense ads.

If you were charging on a Conversion basis then reputable websites wouldn't have to worry about their competitors taking them out like this.