Forum Moderators: open
1:1:5
Or
1:1:5 /and then a Google category/
I have found the "5" to be the PR, but what is the 1:1 and what does the category string that follows mean? The category string is there only occasionally. Is there potientally other info I have not seen yet?
Explanation :
Rank_1:how_many_number_for_PageRank:PageRank
FVN_1:Category_in_DMOZ:Google_Directory
[b]Few other Facts[b] :
1. When you vote for a page with Google Toolbar, your query is [google.com ] for Vote UP and [google.com ] for vote DOWN.
I don't try but in theory you can use auto-refresh to increase your PageRank (like <META HTTP-EQUIV="refresh" CONTENT="x[minimum 1]; URL=http://www.google.com/search?client=navvote&vote=u&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eyourwebsite%2Ecom%2F">)
2. You can find your PageRank and Category using this link :
[google.com ]
To know your website checksum look at your cache
Ex : for Google, today's checksum is ch=5455726090.
Also don't forget the final slash.
I don't search how checksum is calculated but it doesn't seem difficult
Mike
in my previous post i just want to say that checksum algo isn't strong crypto. For example looking at few checksums in your internet cache, you can think :
- checksum is ch=dddddddddd (d for digit)
- ten digits would be a decimal form (so 8 characters in hexa)
---> 1. checksum is limited : only 4 294 967 296 possibilities
(Google has already more than 3 billions pages)
---> 2. checksum use a 32 bits algo (as one byte is eight bits) and you think naturally about CRC32.
---> ....
But it's just a idea which is inconsistent with facts. You think a lot but you search in the wrong way. The only way to solve checksum algo is by disassembling Google Toolbar.
First you will see that, in v1.1.66-deleon, :
- in HTTP request for PR, there is ch=5. So real checksum is the last nine digits. There is also ch=4 but it's not used yet
- checksum is computing from "q=info:" value. ASM subroutine is about 150 lines for "q=info:", "ch=" and "&freshness_check=3"
i don't have many time (i take my exams) but i promise you that i will look at look at following weeks
Mike
(YELLS into communicator) Scotty, please fix the universal translator tool. Jim, Over.
You would still have to surf all the pages that you care about, but at least you wouldn't have to write it all down. It should also keep you within google's TOS, as you would still be manually surfing the pages. But if GoogleGuy says don't do it, then I won't.
Of course it might be a nice addition to the toolbar to have a logging feature that you could turn on. It could tell you the PR and number of backlinks, but you would still have to surf manually