Whose results are they using PPC? Backfill?
They are appearing in my logs a little more often recently.
However there is no contact info on the site, no terms of service or any background info at all for that matter.
<Disclaimer and About Us pages added 24/10/03>
[edited by: IanTurner at 7:23 pm (utc) on Oct. 24, 2003]
it also looks like they are getting a lot of keyword data from someone or some company.
Personally I would never trust a site were you can't get in touch with the people who are running.
DaveN
Do we really want to see a proliferation of such sites?
[edited by: IanTurner at 2:59 pm (utc) on Oct. 23, 2003]
I merely meant more sites with less banner and pop-up advertising. I should have been clearer, sorry. I didn't mean that I wanted to see a proliferation of specialised Demon sites like CheeseDemon or FungalInfectionDemon.
The problem with labelling the sponsored lisings is that they are all sponsored listings for many searches. As with many Espotting (and Overture) affiliates, the site lists all of the PPC results first and then the backfill. I can't honestly see sites labelling every single one of their search results as a sponsored link; that's hardly the way to impress the ladies.
As mentioned before, this is not a hard core user base, this is clever SEO traffic. Over time, if people like the results, then it may build up a user base.
It is worth noting that the Alexa data isn't bad for the top 10,000 sites or so - it is useful for comparison data as long as you look at the averages rather than the day to day numbers.
Nice looking site, but there have been other entrants who appeared highly only to disappear within two months from the first 10 results (financesearcher, uknetguides etc.)
If they tidied up minor bits like the contact details and the "sponsored" status, they would definitely get better press.
Good luck I say.
[edited by: IanTurner at 8:33 pm (utc) on Oct. 24, 2003]
[edit reason] Against charter [/edit]