Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

IIS URL rewrite

don't mind paying for some top notch stuff

         

Adam_C

11:05 am on Feb 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What's the best bit of kit to deal with this?

We don't mind paying for something really good.

macrost

2:47 pm on Feb 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Why buy? :)
[webmasterworld.com...]

But regardless... I've heard that isapi rewrite is pretty good.
If I can only remember the other one.

Mac

f00sion

8:43 pm on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



isapi rewrite is by far the best.. i think the 404 method is a waste of time.

macrost

9:46 pm on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Unless your host won't allow it to be installed. Nevermind how secure it is. :)

Mac

mattglet

12:10 pm on Feb 4, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



done correctly, the 404 method is flawless. getting a filter applied to your site may not always be an option, as macrost said, the host doesn't always let you do it.

-Matt

georgeek

12:26 pm on Feb 4, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Have to agree with mattglet I have one site that uses 404 with 10,000+ pages indexed.

Here is a selection:

ISAPI_Rewrite [isapirewrite.com]

IISRewrite [qwerksoft.com]

XQASP [xde.net]

ASPSpiderBait [webanalyst.com.au]

PortalPageFilter [alphasierrapapa.com]

plumsauce

3:51 am on Feb 5, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member




While I am going to recycle some of my core
isapi code to do rewrites, I would say that
one advantage of the 404 method, is that it
is *infinitely* flexible since the code is
under your direct control. For instance,
I doubt that any of the shrinkwrap products
can do things like "random results driven
by arrays" totally within themselves without
further help from an asp page to finish the
job. That being the case, you might as well
do the whole job within the asp.

Sorry for the runon sentences, my english
teacher always got on my case for the same
thing :)