Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.224.57.95

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

98,2002,02 frontpage

     
1:00 am on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



is it worth it to buy frontpage 98 or is it totally out of date. i just need it for a very basic web site design. how much more advanced is 2000 and 2002?

Woz

1:07 am on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member woz is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



FP98 is Way out of date. Don't use it.

Better to get FP2000 or FP2002 as the code is much cleaner. Also, read up on the FP threads here about using or not using the inbuild helpers.

Onya
Woz

1:09 am on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Microsoft is offering a free 30-day trial on Frontpage 2002 if you're interested in checking it out risk-free:

[microsoft.com...]

8:35 am on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



hollyhats I wanted to second Woz's recommendation. Do not buy FrontPage 98. Almost all of the 'bad reputation' FP has garnered is due to FP98 and the use of auto-generated 'tools' within this software. This is not to say that you couldn't do damage using FP2K or FP2002, but FP98 was horrendous in comparison. I moved up to FP2002 only recently and am amazed at how much more control the software gives you. Even relative new users of FP2002 can generate clean code with the right settings.
8:40 am on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



To be honest I would pay the extra and get Dreamweaver (you can probably get version 4 a bit cheaper today).

Woz

1:20 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member woz is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>I wanted to second Woz's recommendation. Do not buy FrontPage 98.

Actually, to contradict myself, one good reason to get a cheap copy of FP98 is to get a copy of Image Composer which is packaged with it. Great Graphics program. But then, that is another story.

Onya
Woz

1:22 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Image Composer is good, but with Dreamweaver you should get the excellent Fireworks graphics package.

Woz

1:24 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member woz is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



To each his own.

Onya
Woz

1:25 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)



If you are only doing a basic site, then buy FP 2002 (decent investment and u will have it for updates, etc).

And...download the fireworks 30 day trial - do all your graphics work in those 30 days!

Best of both worlds! :)

JOAT

2:37 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The office suite from openoffice.org has an HTML editor and it's free.

Don't know if it's actually any good though - does anyone?

[openoffice.org...]

zooloo

2:47 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Only spent 10 minutes with the openoffice editor in an emergency situation a couple of weeks ago but first impressions were not good. As much as I love Openoffice the html editor is really rubbish.
2:50 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Brett's got one of the cheap 'office' solutions and he uses it all the time (I believe).
5:06 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator brotherhood_of_lan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



hmm, what to do when someone arrives with 3 choices of editor. Give them another 3 suggestions? ;)

I second Woz, The latest FP would silence many of its critics if people were to sit down and use it properly ;)

5:11 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That's the trouble though. Dreamweaver is simply easier to use for the basics.
5:22 pm on Dec 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for the info. I went ahead and ordered the frontpage 2002 with the free 30 day offer.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month