Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

DW vs Mambo vs FP vs .

pros and cons of editors

9:48 pm on Feb 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 22, 2005
votes: 0

Now I've always worked with DW and have built a lot of sites with it, mainly HTML and ASP with many having a SQL back end.

Someone recommended to me to try out Mambo which they were raving about.

I spent a few days messing with it and decided that it was really suited only to intensive content rich sites and relied too heavily on blocky layout and the result is a busy looking site with too much going on and the focus taken away from simple design. Which annoyed me.

Just wondering what others think. Is Mambo the future or would I be wise to steer clear of it?

10:35 pm on Feb 11, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 25, 2005
votes: 0

Well Mambo can be used for a lot of things, if you know what you are doing. You can edit the templates to make it look very basic if you wanted. I have always liked Typo3 more than Mambo or Joomla. Typo3 has a steeper learning curve. I'd recommed looking at Typo3 if you have enough patience to learn it. Plus Mambo is not a WYSIWYG or editor, it is a CMS. I use notepad / wordpad, never did like Dreamweaver.
2:25 pm on Feb 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:May 6, 2004
votes: 0

I use FP for the front end of a couple web sites and Joomla for other parts. I've been known to pull the templates for various CMSs into FP or DW and edit them. CMS's make some parts of a website easier to manage and you can still do your very own thing out front.

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members