Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Content Theft - a Happy Ending

Stolen Content Removed and Monetary Damages Awarded

         

JudgeJeffries

11:48 am on Nov 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have a profitable UK site with 200+ pages each one of about 500 words and each one carefully written by me. I have invested massive time into this project and each page has taken about a day to research, write and optimise. I now find that a competitor, who to my knowledge has had the same problem himself, has taken almost all of my pages, made slight alterations, perhaps one word in ten, and due to bought PR comes in ahead of me for every search term. When I read his pages they are so similar that I thought they were a straight copy. His title and description are different by one inconsequential word.
Given the slight alterations is there anything I can do?

PCInk

12:33 pm on Nov 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Under UK law it is actually illegal to copy some copyrighted text and then change evey word. Odd, but true.

Send them a cease and desist email with a timescale (make it reasonable - 7 days usually works very well, because of law) and make sure that you threaten with a lawyer and you will be claiming for solicitors fee from them, loss of business and for your time, if it goes as far as getting a solicitor.

It is often helpful to find some local lawyers and find out their approximate fees and then include one that you feel comfortable with in the letter, usually the full name and address shows that you are serious.

It is unlikely that it will be up in 7 days time, but possible, and you must be prepared to take it to court.

mgream

6:22 pm on Nov 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It is not a good idea to be threatening - but it is a good idea to use very strong words. This may seem pedantic, but it is important. Even if you are a victim, threats may make the situation worse for you. Keep it civil and professional - but don't lose sight of your rights. For example, the company in question may be prima facie innocent, because it may be the result of a bad employee or contractor who falsely represented to them that they created the content. The company may eventually be on your side in pursuing damages from the contractor: so don't put the company offside at the first step.

Avoid making explicit references to solicitors fees, lost profits, etc. I think the strongly worded letter should indicate that the content be removed within a set time period, otherwise you will use all possible means to take the matter further. Make sure you state that since the infringement, you have evidence that your profits and visitors have been reduced (this is the kind of easy evidence you get from referrer statistics), to make it clear to them that the infringement is having a real impact on your business every single day until the issue is rectified. When you eventually succeed: this may help your award of damages, because you've explicitly made it clear to them initially that there is an economic cost of the action. It may also motivate them to make redress sooner rather than later.

The UK has a very good copyright protection, and the legal system is accessible as a result of the woolf reforms: meaning you could bring a small claims action at little cost if you can't afford a lawyer. If you can afford a lawyer, go and do that right now. Let us know about your outcome.

JudgeJeffries

11:46 pm on Dec 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



LATEST UPDATE.
Employed a hotshot solicitor who has already obtained an offer of settlment. Full details as and when its all over however I need to know how long these stolen pages have been up. I dont think it would be sensible to take the word of the people who lifted them without further proof. The guilty site is not on record on the wayback machine. Are their any other souces of info?

engine

8:24 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Glad there's progress.

You could try their hosting company as they may have backups with the files on them. On the other hand, they may not disclose that information for confidentiality.

Other possibilities include some search engines which are slow to update - sometimes they have a last updated date.

View the source code for the pages to see if there is a clue in there - some people put dates on there.

Sometimes, depending upon the server involved, you can get into the subdirectories and see the date the subdirectory was created.

There's a few ideas for you to try.

mgream

9:02 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You could ask for them to substantiate proof with evidence of records - e.g. web server access logs, directory listings, etc. As part of the settlement make it a condition that they provide the evidence, and sign a statutory declaration to that effect. Your lawyer should also know whether you can tie into the settlement a clause allowing you to seek further damages with additional penalty if it is subsequently discovered that the infringement went back to an earlier date than they stated. This will be an incentive for them not to falsify information.

Do you have some ballpark idea about when the infringement occurred (when did you start losing traffic from google hits?, do you have access logs that show a UA extracting the content from your site?) to know whether they are being reasonably truthful.

Of course, if you think that they are being unreasonable, then don't agree to the settlement and head to legal action - seems as though you have a stronger position, and in real legal action the burden of proof (and the consequences for contempt) are higher, so more likely that they would not try to be dishonest. Although coming to settlment is not an admission of guilt (because it can be for other reasons), it smells very strongly of it!

AFAIK the web archive has a few months delay to it - content takes a while to appear. Check if they have previous content in the web archive, and if so, when it was last updated. You may just be a month or two away from seeing it appear.

There are strange other beasts that roam the net and cache bits of websites too (e.g. whois, alexa [associated with the web archive]).

nakulgoyal

1:51 am on Dec 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Something of the same sort happened with me. I sent them a strong email warning them and it worked...they removed the site immediately. The people were from Singapore. No Hard feelings Singaporians.....!

JudgeJeffries

11:32 pm on Jan 28, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



OK, to get back to this one and give you guys the final outcome is a real pleasure.
Without going into to much detail in excess of 40 pages were copied and altered by about 10% and remained up despite a threatening letter written personally by me. I contacted no win no fee solicitors (lawyers...not the other sort if you're from the US!) who instantly took the case on after they had satisfied themselves that the offender had assets. After negotiation it was agreed that the pages would come down, undertakings not to re-offend were received and damages and legal costs agreed in excess of £20,000.

martinibuster

11:41 pm on Jan 28, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yay!

Score one for the good guy with the pit bull solicitor!

balinor

2:10 pm on Jan 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Impressive! Congrats on your win! Goes a long way to helping us ALL!

rogerd

2:18 pm on Jan 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



Hey, congrats, JJ. Chalk one up for the good guys! Thanks for getting back to us here - we need success stories to offset the "stolen site" bad news we seem to get every day.

Kirby

6:00 pm on Jan 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Good job, JJ. Always like a story where the good guy wins. I'm surprised you got damages. Just goes to show penny wise and pound foolish is often the rule when defending your business and hiring lawyers.

Webwork

11:39 pm on Jan 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Just tell me this: Has the check actually cleared to your or your lawyer's account?

In the down and dirty world of thieves it sometimes never ends.....

troels nybo nielsen

11:59 am on Jan 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Congrats.

Have you written an article about this for your website or is it part of the agreement that you don't take such action? You might keep the article in general terms not suggesting who the offender is. Telling your story to your visitors might send out some warnings to other competitors with "smart ideas".

And have you been contacted by journalists who want to interview you? This is a good story that ought to be interesting for web society in general.

eWhisper

3:11 pm on Jan 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It so nice to see one of these cases successfully resolved.
Congrats - maybe a few more of us can win these cases someday.

JudgeJeffries

5:50 pm on Jan 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If youre in the UK and the the offender has assets just sticky me.
I know a man who can.

Leosghost

11:36 pm on Feb 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Only just saw this thread .....love it ...love it
whats the assets position of google cache anyone?