Forum Moderators: not2easy
As a first measure I just renamed the picture, but that just got me a whole lot of 404s for the original picture. As a second thought, I found my revenge could be a bit sweeter.
So instead of the nice and shiny product photo that he uses on his auction, I found a grubby, dirty, messy scene that's still ok for kids to look at, but that will not exactly add spark to his auction. I gave the pic the same name as the original photo, uploaded it and - voila - there is his auction with the link to my grubby pic. Nice.
I'll probably still have that traffic for a while, but at least I feel I've paid the lazy bugger back some!
If people steal they might as well try to be clever about it and not leave their traces all over the place.
I have the right to name the pictures on my web site any way I want, and also change them around at my whim, don't I? Or are there any recriminations in it for me?
cheers
teylyn
I would appreciate seeing your script. I had one that worked too good .. no images on the Google cache of my index page.
The script required *specifically allowing* certain URLs to link to images. I just couldn't figure out how to allow all datacenters for all the major SEs.
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} .
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}!^http://(www\.)?mysite\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}!google\. [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}!search\?q=cache [NC]
RewriteRule \.(gif¦jpe?g)$ - [NC,F]
They allow the images to appear in Google's cache and Google's image search. I guess it would be the same with Yahoo and MSN. That's supposed to be a solid pipe after gif.