Forum Moderators: not2easy
Have you ever run into having to present facts on a site for a client and questioned the facts or your responsibility in presenting them?
Anyone here want to share experiences both pro and con?
When the data source is your own creation, you can create extra content pages to hold your charts, tables, observations, etc. Most users never check them, but I think helps when seeking listings in Directories like DMOZ.
Your references could link directly to the external sources, but concerns about PageRank might prevent you from doing so.
Will users ever question you or criticize? Yes, rarely. I once got a few critical emails about some health-related content on my site, but when I put up a poll to find out more, I learned that 99% of people were very appreciative. So don't let the rare criticisms bother you too much. AND, after I put the poll results on a webpage, I stopped getting critical emails.
What about copywriters? Do you test their credibility when you hire them to write copy? How do you determine the parameters to assign them to get back credible and legitimate content?
Does having out-of-date content affect the credibility of a website? What safeguards do you put in place to ensure that your content is accurate and current?
Last I found The Web Credibility Project [webcredibility.org], a research project conducted by Stanford University, which I feel, warrants a link and some discussion. Does anyone have thoughts about this study?