Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.17.91

Forum Moderators: bakedjake

Message Too Old, No Replies

Amazon saves millions with Linux switch

   
12:25 am on Oct 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rcjordan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



We've recently...found that Linux--if you look at the overall cost of ownership including the hardware, software, staffing, and purchasing and retirement costs--ends up being significantly less expensive than Unix over a three-year period for things like Web serving

Amazon.com was able to cut $17 million in technology expenses in the last quarter largely because of a switch to Linux. [news.cnet.com]

12:58 am on Oct 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



But there are hidden costs to Linux, Microsoft argues. "I think a lot of customers are lured by the apparent low price of Linux," said Doug Miller, director of competitive strategy for Microsoft's Windows division. "They don't have a real issue with Linux, but it ends up costing them in the long run."

With Linux, customers "end up being in the operating systems business," managing software updates and security patches while making sure the multitude of software packages don't conflict with each other," Miller said. "That's the job of a software vendor like Microsoft."

BBBWWWAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAA.

That's a classic.

4:29 pm on Oct 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"managing software updates and security patches"

Wow! You mean that if you use M$ server software you don't have to deal with security patches? lol that's funny stuff...

2:51 am on Nov 1, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Saw this in a newsletter called WinInfo Daily UPDATE [win2000mag.net] 10/31/01
* LINUX ADOPTION STORIES NOT WHAT THEY SEEM
Some high-profile Linux adoption stories have circulated lately that feature companies such as Amazon and Intel espousing the wonders of the open-source solution. One crucial fact these stories don't reveal, however, is that these Linux adoptions are replacing proprietary and expensive versions of UNIX, not Windows. And as both Amazon and Intel are quick to point out, neither company has even considered replacing Windows boxes with Linux.
4:05 am on Nov 1, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>>And as both Amazon and Intel are quick to point out, neither company has even considered replacing Windows boxes with Linux.

That just seems to strengthen the argument that Windows is a self-contained, PC workstation platform and that *nix is a workhorse server platform for a networked world. Therefore it stands to reason that Windows should remain as an interface workstation and the enterprise class computing power and internet application servers should remain *nix.

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month