Forum Moderators: DixonJones
One factor is how much the server is actually recording in the logfiles. Some host set up full reporting, some partial, some minimal. The more complete the recordsin the larger the logfile.
It is also dependant on the type of site being recorded. If the site is graphic heavy, bu which I mean using a lot of graphics in the design, regardless of size, rather than using large graphics, then there will be many server calls per page to pick up all the graphics, all of which will be recorded in the logfiles. On the other hand, if the site is text/css heavy then the number of calls will be less and so will result in recuced logfiles.
Onya
Woz
Taking Alexa's data of average page views per visitor, and applying this to the number of page requests, we get an (very) approximation of unique daily visitiors of about 39,000.
Matt
Logfile size depends on a number of factors.
even # of visitors depends on what logfile reader you are using, this figute could vary considerably.
Even what type of logfile and what is being recorded etc etc.
Maybe more accurate would be
logfile size/mb served
or logfile size/#of hits(requests)
even that is misleading depending on server/which logs are enabled/logfile extension (type)
0 to 50,000 $49.00
50,000 to 100,000 $69.00
100,000 to 200,000 $99.00
.. and so on.
So, I am trying to detrmine an optimal number for these page views in terms of bandwidth usgae and disk space to host these logs. I think these prices are insance and if I can crack the puzzle of right bandwidth and disk space, I can propose my client to price the solution at very affordable rates.
Thanks for all those who have responded so far.
sdani