Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.60.235

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Image size of action photos

     

grnidone

10:18 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)



Of course everyone wants their images to be as small as possible to download quickly.

But when you have action shots, you need to make the image larger than you would a portrait shot.

If the image kept small, you can't see what is going on in the photo; too big you have download problems.

Do you guys have a good 'rule of thumb' regarding image size to use on action shots vs regular portrait type pictures?

-G

oilman

10:30 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



for me it really depends on the audience. If it's something very specific and the audience is almost guaranteed to wanted the info on the page etc I can allow myself to relax a little and go with a bigger image. On the other side I'll often go with an interlaced image so that there is at least a blurry picture to start. I've found folks are more willing to wait and see how the pic turns out than they are to wait for a blank box to fill in.

rcjordan

11:37 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rcjordan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>rule of thumb

For jpg shots that have detail that's important to the topic, I like the largest dimension to be 320p. For "accent" and secondary shots, I'll drop the largest dimension to 220p. I've found this works out pretty well both for speed issues and layout.

We've discussed it before, but getting too small for the higher resolution screens is a concern, too. Like everything else, it's a balancing act.

mivox

11:44 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



One idea: using a cropped thumbnail, linked to a full size "opens in new window" image.

Say you have a photo of the first three horses crossing the finish line in the big race, but to have a nice clear photo showing all three, the image would need ot be 500-600 pixels wide...

Crop the image down to a nice, tight shot of the #1 horse's head, which you can then optimize for quick viewing and high quality, linked to a new window showing the full shot for those who want to see it.

rcjordan

11:51 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rcjordan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>the image would need ot be 500-600 pixels wide
>
And list all of those supersize shots, each with its own html page (with links to OTHER pages in the site, natch) in a directory that says "Download pictures, FREE for non-commercial use." You can't imagine the traffic I get from this trick.

Robert Charlton

4:31 am on Jun 30, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



At the mention of "action" shots, some full screen sports jpegs from the NBC Olympics Site (built by Quokka Sports here in the SF Bay Area) came to mind. These were easily 800 by 600, and provided full screen backgrounds for the site... but the file size, it turns out, was very small... 10K. The trick was that they were monochrome... tinted sepia or whatever. The size on the webpage was enough to compensate for lack of full color.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month