Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 35.175.191.168

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Do engines like /content or /content.html ?

Will most engines prefer "abc.com/content" or "abc.com/content.html?"

     
6:52 pm on Aug 22, 2002 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 22, 2002
posts:28
votes: 0


I can put whatever I want at the end of a url, .html, .htm, .asp, .webmasterworldisamazing, or nothing at all.
Right all my pages are set to domain.com/_content. (They used to be "index.asp?page=", we replaced all that with "_") Will engines prefer that I suffix all these pages which look like directories now with a .html, .htm, .asp, or leave them look like directories?

I get the feeling google may reward the pages if they are left looking like directories, but other engines may not crawl the pages at all.

Summary.
1. Leave nothing at end of url, or put .html?

2. Do you think "-" would have better than "_"? I know anything is better than "index.asp?page="

Thanks everyone.

9:35 pm on Aug 23, 2002 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38256
votes: 115


As long as the content type returned in the header is a proper text/html, you should be ok. I wouldn't risk it though, and would use the full .htm or .html extension. An ending directory slash would suffice too.
11:46 pm on Oct 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 21, 2001
posts:115
votes: 0


I believe that files in the root directory will yield better results, it's not going to make or break you, but it's a good idea to keep your important pages as close to the root as possible. A while back they were debating whether or not put keyphrases in directories & and the filenames, but I think it's probably moot at this point.

I would go with www.site.com/content.html

1:05 am on Oct 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:July 16, 2001
posts:545
votes: 0


The only justifyable reason I've seen given for keeping your pages close to root, is shorter URLs.

The distance in PR from / to /this/other/page.html, is only as far as it takes the spider to find the link. If you link to it right from the main page, then it'll be weighted more(generally) than if you only link to it from a page in /this/other/index.html.