Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Your Stanford research doc of the day...

         

Brett_Tabke

6:18 pm on Jun 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Copy Detection Mechanisms for Digital Documents *
Sergey Brin, James Davis, Hector Garcia-Molina:

[www-db.stanford.edu...]

Think about Google redistributing copyrighted documents when reading that one. The irony, the irony.

digitalghost

7:50 pm on Jun 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm not a lawyer, but even under the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000, it seems that Google's cache is on shaky ground. [dcita.gov.au...]

I've never been a fan of Google's cache, or the Wayback machine, both of which seem to dance around copyright issues, especially in regard to preserving works that the author may deem transitory.

DG

24bit

2:36 am on Jun 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think the Google cache is one of the many reasons why they're such a superior engine than the rest. I think it's great, and apparently so does a lot of other people.

Brett_Tabke

9:55 am on Jun 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



From Tara at Research Buzz, comes a good study on webcredibility:

[captology.stanford.edu...]

Fogg, B.J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., and Trowbridge, T. (2002). “Stanford-
Makovsky Web Credibility Study 2002: Investigating what makes Web sites credible today.” A Research
Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab & Makovsky & Company. Stanford University. Available
at www.webcredibility.org