Forum Moderators: LifeinAsia
1. Start with one's own site and keep working on own site(s), never to bother for getting clients.
2. Start with clients sites and keep working on them, never to bother for own site.
3. Start with one's own site and as you learn the tricks, move on to getting clients too, now working both for your sites and for others sites too, focussing more on clients sites.
4. Start with clients sites and you learn the tricks, move on to working on your own site(s), now working both for clients sites and your own, focussing more on your own sites.
I belong to category 2 but now I want to make the jump towards category 4. What categories other members belong to and what has turned out as a better experience for them especially who switched from one category to another?
Till now, I have been doing SEO for others i.e. my clients. I do not have a site of my own (should I say I didn't get the time ;) ) But seriously, I had some ideas and registered a couple of domains too but never worked upon them to complete the sites. So far, I have concentrated only on clients sites. But of late, I am thinking of starting a couple of my own sites.
What do members here think has been more rewarding and satisfying for them - working on their own site(s) or working for clients? Also I think satisfaction would weigh more for own sites but would there be good money too to justify in this case?
I am sure many of the experienced members here can shed some light on this.
Thanks in advance for sharing.
Get a percentage of sales from the client and make their site your own. As far as I'm concerned there is no their sites / my sites issue any more. imho
And it is indeed a very good idea.
I believe its especially good for us Indians because most of the e-comm savvy markets are in US,Canada and Europe. Collecting orders from web site is fine but shipping costs, customs and the 'documentation required for exports' hassles have prevented me so far from running my own shop. Tying up with webmasters in those countries and getting a share of the profits works very well.
Though I would love to hear from any other Indian out here who has tried it :)
Jaski
3. Start with one's own site and as you learn the tricks, move on to getting clients too, now working both for your sites and for others sites too, focussing more on clients sites.
As with all things on the web, it depends on what business sector you are in.
I started with my own travel sites, which generate traffic, which I now feed to clients sites. The thing works synergistically.
Wouldn't say I focus more on clients sites. Their traffic depends on my own sites traffic.
Get a percentage of sales from the client and make their site your own. As far as I'm concerned there is no their sites / my sites issue any more. imho
That`s exactly the way we have done it for a couple of clients. It takes some arguing/discussing before they understand the upside in involving SEM-people like myself to run their site, but eventually they understand that it`s a win-situation for both parties.
Your suggestion is really appreciated but would it work in all cases? As far as I understand they should work perfectly for e-commerce sites selling products. But do you think it would work for services too?
andreasfriedrich,
>>I just build sites that are useful to the user
So you are satisfied with working on your sites. Hope the money is good too :)
I realize this but if I start working on my own site, I think it would be more of an affiliate site or maybe if I can get in touch with some good merchant to sell on their behalf.
wackybrit,
>> I imagine getting commissions from the US/UK etc is good for Indians, since the money goes a lot further in India?
You are correct wackybrit. The dollars turn out to be good money in Indian currency.
Consulting services would require a great degree of trust on your part. You would have to know the person/persons very well.
But some consulting services do require a good deal of face-to-face interaction and though I can get the visitors and the leads, it might not be possible for me to learn the finer details of their consulting business.
Not exactly that. Its more like - Instead of getting a site maintenance fee from the client I get a commission on sales. Its quite a bit more than what I would get as maintenance fee. Of course I have to maintain the site as well since I am the developer and SEO both for that.
Then one of these customers decided to go a different direction. Fortunatly we had written in the contract that we owned the sites and traffic that we were sending them so we moved that over to an affiliate program and have been building affiliate sites ever since. I enjoy this much better than having to deal with clients and having to explain everything I do to them. There is much less pressure and much more money (in many cases) working on your own sites as opposed to clients.
If I do take on any clients now I can charge them much more and do a much better job than before and I don't feel bad turning down a client that I think would be difficult to work with. It seems like option 4 is what I am describing but if I had to do it all over again I would start with option 1 and maybe dabble a bit in 3.
Some service YES [web hosting as an example]Consulting services would require a great degree of trust on your part. You would have to know the person/persons very well.
Mike, I am interested in how you monitor the honesty in this type of set-up, even if it is an e-commerce site. Ok if it is an affiliate program or you send the traffic from your own site, but if you optimise the client's site and then take a cut on the increased sales, how do you know that they are honest?
I enjoy this much better than having to deal with clients and having to explain everything I do to them.
This is one of the reasons I want to work on my own sites. This way I do not have to clarify why I did this or that to someone who doesn't understand it in spite of my explaining all the details.
Depends on how the existing relationship is working, as long as you and your client are happy then why change it? You can always add something onto it.
But additionally there is always another niche to try. I have found that as long as the client get business through the web they are not so worried how it arrives (providing its ethical). Sometimes commission deals work best but other times the client see the worth of the site and would prefer to pay a set fee for traffic, referrals or enquiries.
The service industry is harder to crack, you normally have to take the risk on behalf of the client but once its working a partner worth having will know the value of your work and pay you well. You have to have a degree of trust, a good partner will not be dishonest (on purpose) and risk losing the business. I personally don’t try, and worry, about tracking everything; I use that time to work on something else.
Also depends on where you are based. If you’re unable to meet your clients and build rapport then perhaps your own sites are best.
Smiley
For those of you who do take a cut on the profits/sales, how do you know you're getting your share? Do you let your partner handle the fees or do you? Do you have tools in place that monitor sales/traffic so you know what you should be getting?
Every sale is meticulously recorded in database when the online payment takes place for the purchase. Offline sales (phone,fax,post) are completely his .. I knew I could never track those so the terms of contract were negotiated assuming that.
I was thinking about approaching sites that sell a product and instead of offering SEO services I would like to set up an affiliate program where I take a percentage of the sales. I could then use any method I wanted to use to send them traffic. They won't need to know or care if it's PPC or SEO. As long as they make sales we're both happy.
My thoughts were to use a third party to monitor the sales. Is this possible? Could something like ibill be used?
Maybe as Mike suggested it may be wise to install an affiliate tracking proogram on their sites.
Is it common for some of the more common cart systems to have affiliate capabilities?
Regards,
Rich