Forum Moderators: LifeinAsia
In other words, say you invent some "company profile page" with nothing but false data, just to make it sound good. Now, these people don't exist, except in your head...and to make clients think there are 12 monkeys running the show, instead of 2. I believe this is possibly unethical (depending on your definition of ethics- but let's not go there) and this is perhaps 'dodgy' but is this illegal?
In any agreements with the company and clients, it would be made clear that there was only the people running the show doing the work, and the company name would be made very clear, to show who the contract was between, client and company. But for looks sake...there would be this incredibly slick page...with all sorts of "tasty" info...
Would this constitute fraud in some way? I haven't done this, but I keep thinking, this could help...if done properly. And there are those two guys who make American films, and even got a fake person nominated for an award, because they didn't want to have their names on the film too many times (I believe it was Fargo???). They didn't get into any legal trouble, and I believe the fake person's bio even made into into several print publications...
So if anyone can point me in the direction for some info relating to this...it would be appreciated. I'm trying to flush out a virtual company, making it as "real" as possible, and this seems like a good way to go. :) Thanks.
So by what you said Brett, this would be false advertising and illegal for them to inflate their numbers. It's not like the IRS is going to do an audit if somebody complains, finds out it isn't true, and they are going to get busted...but I see how this could be a problem. So given that there is probably a big grey area in this issue how do you find out what is the actual law? Varies from state to state, or is there a federal statute?
Does number of employees count as advertising? Does a disclaimer of warranties in a terms of service document protect you from this kind of thing? People buy a product or service, from a company...it's not the company that they are buying, correct?
There must be some kind of "wiggle room" on this...and I'm looking for it. Thanks again, look forward to any advice, or experience on this one.
I'm pretty sure that neither practice is ethical (at least the last time I checked).
Having said that, there is nothing wrong with creating the impression that one's operation is bigger and more successful than is really the case (at the moment!). Here are a few thoughts:
1) Let your web site speak for itself - the design, the amount of content, and the quality of the content will communicate to your visitors more than a phony "About Us" page. We've all visited sites that immediately convinced us that we were dealing with a quality operation - make yours one of those. This may mean professional help with graphics, copy, or wherever you feel your weak points are.
2) List departmental information and e-mail addresses. Nobody has to know that you are simultaneously the Sales, Human Resources, and Marketing departments. You'll hire separate staffers as soon as business volume warrants. :)
3) Need still more credibility? Set up an advisory board. This is like a board of directors, except you don't have to pay attention to them if you don't want to. You may have to cough up a few shares if you are a corporation, or otherwise compensate the advisors, but you might get some respectable sounding business and technology types to sign on. They can be sources of advice, contacts, and future funding, too. With their permission, you can list them (and their credentials) on your site.
I might have to try that. We (there are two of us, but I'm the SEO guy) always try to play up the scale of the operation to clients with the 'we' tricks, multiple email addresses, 800 numbers, departments, etc. But I can see how coming out and simply saying that there are 2 highly skilled individuals involved and that number can scale (occasionally we bring in temp help on projects) for bigger projects, meaning that our clients are not paying for overhead might be a great strategy. It would definitely make our USP a bit more unique if nothing else. I'll have to ponder on that for awhile