Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
[mattcutts.com...]
I still wonder if there's room for a paid service for 1 on 1 communication, later, when and if these trials are successful per this thread :
[webmasterworld.com...]
Personally, i hope it works so that the quality of communication can improve between webmasters and with Google, eliminating a lot of the BS with facts.
I have been lucky and had excellent service from google in relation to Spam Reporting and the homepage only issue.
I think Google need to think of a new way to let genuine whitehats communicate to get their indexing fixed or spam reported, perhaps by setting up a report service that auto checks your site for guideline breaches first before allowing direct communication with the Google engineers. Sites that fail would be penalised their and then. Only fair after all.
Might just put the chancer borderline greyhats off don't you think?
Perhaps a process of authenticating genuine webmasters could be enacted with a combination of paid subscription to a service, with some reporting system around the very helpful suggestion put forward by Elio above.
My feeling is that only a small number of webmasters would subscribe anyway, but that they would be invaluable to perfecting the Google product/webmaster relationship.
Instead of dealing with webspam in this manner, why not deal with more important issues like allowing webmasters to identify root domains and root content or 301 domains or supplemental pages?
webmaster@ doesn't work for three of my sites.
I've suggested several times that the "responsible email address" should be a tag in the XML sitemap file.
BTW, google should use the email address that is registered with google sitemaps. If the site is not registered it should use the default of webmaster@ or even check arin.
They may well now have a team of thousands that could help .. but they aint interested.
They are there to make money not to make the internet world a better place.
RIP to our friend Google.
Welcome to the dawn of evil!