Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.72.69

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Cache gone for most non-www pages

is this a step in the right direction?

     
4:17 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:July 21, 2005
posts:84
votes: 0


I've been working on trying to get all non-www pages removed from Googles index which are also supplemental.

The redirect seems to be working ok on most pages but a few just seem to be stuck.

Today I have noticed that many of the non-www versions still hanging around no longer have a cache.

Do you think this is a step in the right direction or what?

Thanks,
Suzie

9:12 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member steveb is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2002
posts:4652
votes: 0


No. Makes no difference.
9:48 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from KZ 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lammert is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 10, 2005
posts:2903
votes: 7


Yesterday for one of my sites all the supplementals were gone from the index, today they are all back. Also cache for those pages disappears en reappears again depending on the time of day, and weather forecast. Re-check tomorrow, the cache will probably be back.

Unfortunately there has been no single post on this board about any real progress in the supplemental issues of Google, except for the temporary glitch where whole sites went supplemental a few weeks ago and GoogleGuy personally interfered.

10:42 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 25, 2002
posts:36
votes: 0


Internally I link to my pages as wiget.htm not [mysite.com...]
Is this considered the canonical problem? Internal linking?

Please excuse my ignorance on this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Brad

11:09 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


lammert, you may have missed the positive reports in the swarm of other posts, but I have read several. Just recently, see [webmasterworld.com...] mssg #183 from Grinler.

Brad (Need More Hits): relative linking does not, in itself, mean you will have a canonical problem. Do a site:example.com query and see if there are any pages listed by more than one url -- with and without index.html, or with and without "www" for instance.

11:32 am on Mar 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from KZ 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lammert is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 10, 2005
posts:2903
votes: 7


tedster, with "except for the temporary glitch where whole sites went supplemental a few weeks ago" I was referring to the BigDaddy supplemental problem where some positive results have been seen.

Sorry for being not more precise.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members