Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Anyone else notice this when they do the site command?
Shortened listings containing only the web address?
domain.com/
To
domain.com/index.htm
some us a 301 and others 302.
Rather than letting the server show the default page.
Could this be the problem, have you checked the test dc's to see if those pages are fully indexed?
Vimes.
As is commonly known Google has had - and still has - problems with homepages/root pages - they can easily be hijacked or wrongly allocated (as in Homepage Canonical problems)
Hopefully as the test DC develops more of these problems will be solved as this is exactly what it is targetting.
To me it seems we are in a state of limbo at the moment - the old index with all its problems seems to be hanging in there - while the new index just does not seem ready yet.
Do people see either of these two issues relating to the problem:
- Too similar/identical page titles/META's involving homepages, or,
- Relationship to use of redirects? If so, 301's? 302's? (Yes, I asked about 301's as well as 302's.)
G simply cannot rely on Webmasters/sites being perfect if they really want to show all the good content, some of which is fielded by relatively non technical, small to mid sized site operators. No margin for error these days. :/
We had been stable in Google for months until recently.
Now in the course of an hour I can search and find, not find, find...and so on and so on.
One minute we seem fully indexed, the next just the URL's.
Also, when we do show in the rankings if I click on 'cache' I get an error message, whereas in the past our pages were cached - in fact sometimes so much so that it caused problems for us.
For one search term I test on if we're there we're top of the listing and yet I can perform the same search 10 minutes later and Google acts as though we don't exist.
I'd appreciate any help/further information on this!
It's not an algorithm change (that's what we currently reserve the name "update" for), and Matt said on his blog that "It should be much more subtle/gentle than an update." But as this new infrastructure phases in and out of the live results, we are seeing some very odd effects. This area is most definitely one of them.
The changes will probably go on for a while -- on Jan 4 he said 1-2 months. If your sites are affected, I would suggest just strapping on your seat belt for a ride, rather than doing anything radical for a while. Of course, if you learn something about your site or your server in this process that isn't right -- certainly fix that.
Unique title/description tags on all pages
Proper 301's in place.
This site has been well crawled and well ranked for at least three years. Titles and descriptions still showing on 66.249.93.104 on some pages, but not on others URL only on the main index - not even a cache - and some pages on 66.249.93.104 are not showing a cache either.
No black hat stuff on this site.
Very frustrating...
WBF
This is a small all html site with proper 301 from example.com to www.example.com in place, yet Google can't index it correctly.
Similar to what I am experiencing. Of a dozen or so sites, only one is effected (so far). It is probably the best of the lot - certainly the oldest, most content rich, most linked to and most respected.
Makes one suspicious of what the short term future might bring, doesn't it? Is there a MAJOR update just around the corner?
WBF
I have not had any canonical issues in two or three years, though there is a section of the site that would probably be subject to this since I have not figured out how to preserve IBL's to old urls with query strings while redirecting to new urls without.
I doubt though that would effect the entire site like what I am seeing. The problematic part of the site lies in its own sub directory.
I miss the old days when it all kind of happened at once. Seems like anymore it rolls slowly across the web, and we hear squaking from different niches over a two or three week period of time.
Cripes, this thread started a week ago and I am just now seeing what people were referring to.
WBF
Hold on to your nerve and use that conserved energy positively ;-)
All the Best
Col :-)
Still experimenting with this one.